Back

Non-Medical COVID-19 Impacts and Hearing Status: A Global Study of Differential Health Impact Among Deaf, Hard of Hearing, and Hearing Populations

Siddiqi, S.; Murray, M.; Hall, W.; Koplitz, M.; Dye, T. D. V.

2026-06-17 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.06.09.26355192 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Deaf and hard of hearing (HoH) experienced complex challenges during the COVID19 pandemic, including obscured visual communication from mask mandates, inaccessible public health messaging, and inadequate interpreter availability. We examined whether hearing status predicted nonmedical COVID19 impact on a global level. Methods: We conducted a nested cross-sectional analysis within a global study collecting data across two waves (April to May 2020 and July to August 2022) from 184 countries. Participants (N=7,998) were categorized as Deaf (n=304), Hard of Hearing (HoH; n=951), or Hearing (n=6,743). The primary outcome was a composite COVID-related non-medical Personal Impact TScore derived from 14 items across employment, resource access, and healthcare domains. Multinomial logistic regression models progressively adjusted for demographic, structural, and psychosocial variables. Results: Deaf participants reported substantially higher rates of pandemic-related job loss (28.9% vs. 9.6% hearing), healthcare cancellations (39.9% vs. 24.6%), and inability to obtain basic supplies. Over half (55.9%) of Deaf participants scored above the median composite impact index, compared to 39.2% of hearing participants. In the fully adjusted model, Deaf status remained an independent predictor of high non-medical impact (aOR=1.6, 95% CI: 1.1 to 2.4). HoH status showed no statistically significant difference from hearing participants in any model. Conclusions: People identifying as Deaf experienced significant disparities during COVID19 when compared with HoH or hearing people, driven by language access barriers and institutional exclusion rather than hearing loss per se. These experiences underscore the importance for systemic interventions centering on accessible communication, Deaf-centered needs, and reducing audism in Deaf-hearing interaction.

Matching journals

The top 16 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
16.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.7%
3
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
4
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
5
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.8%
6
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.3%
7
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
8
Ear & Hearing
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
9
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
10
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
11
Journal of Global Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
13
European Journal of Epidemiology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
14
European Journal of Public Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
Journal of Public Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
50% of probability mass above
17
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Health & Place
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
20
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.2%
22
Emerging Infectious Diseases
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
npj Science of Learning
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
24
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Trends in Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
27
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
28
Swiss Medical Weekly
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
29
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%