Back

EditorForge: An Active-Site-Aware Framework for Inverse-Folding-Based Protein Redesign

Chen, A.; Siddiqui, J.; Taucar, W.; Tiralongo, L.; Tkachenko, M.; Xu, A.; Bawa, S.; Guo, S.; Pinska, O.; Rim, J.; Shi, J.; Wang, M.; Zhao, E.

2026-06-11 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.08.730993 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Inverse-folding models can rapidly generate protein sequences compatible with a supplied backbone, but unconstrained redesign is poorly suited to enzyme and genome-editor-associated domains, where catalytic, substrate-proximal, and conserved structural regions must remain protected. In this paper, we present EditorForge, a modular constraint-and-audit suite for editor-domain protein redesign that wraps fixed-backbone inverse folding with explicit design masks, fixed-position enforcement, active-site-proximity auditing, active-site-shielded regeneration, and downstream structural quality control. Using full-length Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase structure 4MH8 (MMLV RT 4MH8) as a demonstration target, EditorForge first restricted redesign to a bounded 25-position envelope while fixing 428 residues. An initial audit detected active-site-proximal failure modes despite fixed-position integrity. Later, the Active Site Shield module then removed five unsafe design positions, replaced them with lower-contact alternatives, and regenerated candidates under stricter constraints. Post Shield Audit evaluated 24 regenerated candidates, all of which satisfied the hard sequence/mask and active-site-shield constraints. For the eight candidates that were selected or returned for structure-prediction/refolding quality control, Enhanced RefoldQC found that all 8 evaluated predicted structures passed the computational structure-QC screen. That said, the selected 8 candidates passed the computational structure-QC screen, with global C RMSD values of 1.2061-1.5555 {degrees}A, active-site C RMSD values of 0.4098-1.8397 {degrees}A, mutation-neighborhood C RMSD values of 1.3155-1.6848 {degrees}A, and average pLDDT-like confidence values of 94.87-95.11. In short, EditorForge provides a reproducible triage layer that converts general inverse-folding output into constrained and editor-specific candidate sets for downstream structural and biological review on top of existing structural prediction tools.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
22.0%
2
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.8%
3
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.9%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.3%
5
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 9%
4.1%
7
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
8
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.1%
9
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
10
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
15
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Journal of Cheminformatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
20
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Journal of Structural Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Journal of Computational Chemistry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.8%
26
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%