Back

Low-Dose Aspirin Adherence Following Objective cell-free RNA-Based Preeclampsia Risk Testing: A Real-World Survey Study

Moe, A. B.; Haverty, C.; Lee, M.; Hahn, S. E.; McElrath, T. F.; Jain, M.; Rasmussen, M.; Corso, A.; Larson, M. L.; Morrison, H.; Melroy, L. M.; Roofeh, J.; Phelps-Sandall, B.; Kiefer, D.; Biggio, J. R.

2026-06-10 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.06.08.26355195 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: Preeclampsia (PE) is a leading cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, and low-dose aspirin (LDA) prophylaxis is the cornerstone of evidence-based prevention. Despite guideline recommendations, LDA adherence remains poor, with 10-25% of moderate-risk patients taking aspirin. Objective personalized risk stratification using biomarkers has been shown to motivate behavior change in other disease contexts. Survey data suggest that patients are more motivated to take aspirin if informed by an objective predictive test. Here, we report real-world LDA adherence among patients who received a high-risk result from a cell-free RNA (cfRNA) PE risk prediction test. Methods: This retrospective, observational survey study included asymptomatic patients of advanced maternal age (AMA; [&ge;] 35 years at delivery) with singleton pregnancies without USPSTF-defined preexisting high-risk conditions for PE who received the cfRNA PE risk prediction test. Patients who opted in to receive text message surveys were asked about LDA use following receipt of test results. High adherence was defined as reporting LDA use on at least 6 of 7 days per week at least 85% of the time surveyed. The primary analysis included patients with a high-risk test result and at least one LDA frequency survey response following receipt of test result. The observed proportion of adherent patients was compared to a baseline estimate of 25% using an exact binomial test. Results: Of 166 patients who received a cfRNA PE risk prediction test result, 48 (28.9%) received a high-risk result. Of these, 29 (60%) opted in and responded to at least one survey, constituting the primary analysis population. Twenty-seven of the 29 (93.1%; 95% CI: 78.0-98.1%) were classified as highly adherent, significantly higher than the 25% baseline adherence estimate for moderate-risk patients (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Among surveyed patients who received a high-risk cfRNA PE test result, the proportion classified as highly adherent to LDA (93%) substantially exceeded published estimates of adherence in a similar patient population and met the clinically meaningful threshold of [&ge;] 80% associated with reduced risk of preterm preeclampsia. These findings indicate that objective and personalized biomarker risk testing may be a powerful driver of behavior change that current guidelines have failed to produce.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
2
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
4
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
7
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.6%
8
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
12
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
13
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
14
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
16
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
17
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
18
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
20
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
21
Placenta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
22
Journal of Medical Economics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
23
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
24
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
26
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
27
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
28
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
29
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
30
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%