Back

Impact of Early Treatment on Symptom Improvement and Procedural Events among Men with BPH and Bothersome Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: A Contemporary Analysis of the American Urological Association Quality (AQUA) Registry

Ernandez, J.; Najafi, A.; Roehrborn, C. G.; Lerner, L. B.

2026-06-10 urology
10.64898/2026.06.08.26355194 medRxiv
Show abstract

PURPOSE: As the armamentarium of BPH therapies continues to expand, it remains imperative to maximize patient satisfaction and minimize decisional regret. We sought to determine the impact of time from BPH diagnosis to index treatment on symptom improvement and subsequent procedural events. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried the American Urological Association Quality Registry for men [&ge;] 40 years old with BPH, available IPSS data, and no receipt of prior BPH treatment. Index treatment included medication, surgery, or minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST). Outcomes included IPSS over 3 years of follow-up, change in percentage of mild lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) by 3 months, and time to procedural event. Patients were stratified by time from index diagnosis to treatment by <12 months, 1-3 years, and >3 years. Outcomes were compared across time-to-treatment cohorts with appropriate statistical tests with p < 0.05 as significant. RESULTS: 43,919 patients met criteria with 19,642 pursuing treatments. Patients pursued treatment at comparably lower baseline IPSS compared to prior prospective series. Patients undergoing surgery and MIST had significantly higher baseline IPSS, while medical comorbidities were significantly more common among men initiating pharmacotherapy. Early surgery and MIST were associated with significant improvement in IPSS within 6-12 months and an increase in mild LUTS by 3 months. All forms of early treatment were associated with delayed time to procedural events, including catheterization and fulguration. CONCLUSIONS: Early procedural intervention for BPH is associated with early symptom improvement and delayed time to procedural events among real-world, contemporary practice.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
19.6%
2
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.8%
3
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.5%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
6
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
8
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
9
American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
13
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
19
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
20
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
26
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
28
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%