Behavioral and Functional Neuroimaging Effects of Delivering a Course of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Personalized Targets Within the Ventrolateral Or Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Treatment-Seeking Participants with Cannabis Use Disorder

Background: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a promising treatment across addictive disorders including Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD). Stimulation of two rTMS-targets, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPFC), limbic and executive control network hubs respectively, may yield differential effects. In this pilot trial, we explored the differential effects of 36-sessions of rTMS applied to either the vmPFC or LDLPFC. Methods: Treatment-seeking participants with moderate or severe CUD (n=20, 10F, age=33.3+9.8SD) were randomized to 36-sessions of open-label rTMS (two sessions-per-visit, two or three visits-per-week) to either the LDLPFC (3000-pulses; 10Hz) or vmPFC (900-pulses; 1Hz) using personalized functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) targets along with three-sessions of Motivational Enhancement Therapy. At baseline and following rTMS, the Time-Line Follow-Back was used to measure Days-per-week of cannabis use and the fMRI Regulation of Craving (ROC) task was used to measure network activation to cues associated with long-term negative ('Later') and short-term positive ('Now') consequences of cannabis use. Results: Eighty percent of participants completed study-rTMS. There was a significant decrease in days-per-week of cannabis use in both groups (vmPFC: d=7.9; DLPFC, d=3.1) between the four-weeks of baseline and seven-weeks of follow-up. LDPFC-rTMS reduced fMRI BOLD signal magnitude and increased LDLPFC functional connectivity in response to cues, while vmPFC-TMS reduced functional connectivity. Conclusions: Treatment-seeking participants with CUD reduced the number of days-per-week they used cannabis when receiving rTMS applied to either the LDPFC or vmPFC, while fMRI effects differed by treatment target. Future larger sham-controlled trials are needed for efficacy and biomarker determination.