Healthcare professionals' perspectives on a multilevel cardiovascular risk management intervention (PROSPERA programme)
Bongaerts, V. A. M. C.; van Gestel, L. C.; van Peet, P. G.; Vuijk, M.-L. S.; Hageman, S. H. J.; Dorresteijn, J. A. N.; Bonten, T. N.; Numans, M. E.; van Os, H. J. A.; Vos, R. C.
Show abstract
Background: Two-thirds of Dutch cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) for patients at risk of cardiovascular disease is delivered in primary care practices. While individual risk scores are increasingly used during consultation, a population-level structure for risk-based patient outreach is not currently available. We therefore developed the PROSPERA programme, a multilevel intervention comprising population-level risk stratification and individual-level support tools. Aim: To assess anticipated and experienced barriers and facilitators among healthcare professionals (HCPs) to inform implementation in primary care. Methods: We conducted four focus groups and six interviews with nine primary care HCPs to explore anticipated and experienced barriers and facilitators. Inductive codes were thematically analysed and assigned to corresponding domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the related Capability, Opportunity, Motivation model of Behaviour. Results: Barriers and facilitators were identified in 11 TDF domains. Population-level barriers included altered professional roles and limitations in technological infrastructure. Individual-level barriers were limited skills in interpreting risk calculations and difficulty integrating tools into clinical routine. Facilitators were related to beliefs on the importance of providing proactive care (population level), the use of U-Prevent for risk communication (individual level) and positive patient responses to the Lifestylecheck questionnaire (individual level). Conclusion: Addressing barriers and facilitators identified at both the population and individual levels can support implementation of the PROSPERA programme. Opportunities exist in education and training of HCPs in risk communication, as well as support in restructuring the physical and digital environment.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the first wave of COVID-19 on those with lifelong conditions: a case study of congenital heart disease 94%
- Long Covid and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study 94%
- Anatomy of a Failure: Can a Cognitive-Bias Modification Intervention Improve Physical Activity in Patients Following a Cardiac Rehabilitation Programme? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping rehabilitation pathways after cardiac surgery: Identifying key points for patient involvement and gaps in care 95%
- ‘The illness isn’t the end of the road’ - Patient perspectives on the initiation of and early participation in a multi-disease, community-based exercise programme 94%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving cardiovascular health in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Development of the Cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with aneurysms (CRISP) behaviour change intervention 95%
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 95%
- Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE): A feasibility report of a pilot cluster randomised trial of prescribing policy in primary care to compare the effectiveness of thiazide-type diuretics in hypertension 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 96%
- Factors influencing focused practice: A qualitative study of resident and early-career family physician practice choices 93%
- General practitioner workforce sustainability to maximise effective and equitable patient care: a realist review 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.