Back

Healthcare professionals' perspectives on a multilevel cardiovascular risk management intervention (PROSPERA programme)

Bongaerts, V. A. M. C.; van Gestel, L. C.; van Peet, P. G.; Vuijk, M.-L. S.; Hageman, S. H. J.; Dorresteijn, J. A. N.; Bonten, T. N.; Numans, M. E.; van Os, H. J. A.; Vos, R. C.

2026-06-09 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.08.26355169 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Two-thirds of Dutch cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) for patients at risk of cardiovascular disease is delivered in primary care practices. While individual risk scores are increasingly used during consultation, a population-level structure for risk-based patient outreach is not currently available. We therefore developed the PROSPERA programme, a multilevel intervention comprising population-level risk stratification and individual-level support tools. Aim: To assess anticipated and experienced barriers and facilitators among healthcare professionals (HCPs) to inform implementation in primary care. Methods: We conducted four focus groups and six interviews with nine primary care HCPs to explore anticipated and experienced barriers and facilitators. Inductive codes were thematically analysed and assigned to corresponding domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the related Capability, Opportunity, Motivation model of Behaviour. Results: Barriers and facilitators were identified in 11 TDF domains. Population-level barriers included altered professional roles and limitations in technological infrastructure. Individual-level barriers were limited skills in interpreting risk calculations and difficulty integrating tools into clinical routine. Facilitators were related to beliefs on the importance of providing proactive care (population level), the use of U-Prevent for risk communication (individual level) and positive patient responses to the Lifestylecheck questionnaire (individual level). Conclusion: Addressing barriers and facilitators identified at both the population and individual levels can support implementation of the PROSPERA programme. Opportunities exist in education and training of HCPs in risk communication, as well as support in restructuring the physical and digital environment.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
17.3%
2
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.1%
5
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
8
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
11
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
17
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
21
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
26
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%