Interoceptive accuracy and attention across multimorbidity classes: A latent class analysis
Mulder, J.; Boeker, C. M.; Smit, A. K.; Kiefte-de Jong, J. C.
Show abstract
Background Multimorbidity is increasingly prevalent, and associated with worse clinical and psychosocial burdens. Interoception, the brain's ability to sense and interpret internal bodily signals, may contribute to multimorbidity, through its link with health behaviors, stress regulation, and mental health. This study examines whether self-reported interoceptive accuracy and attention is associated with multimorbidity, by identifying multimorbid subgroups and their interoceptive profiles. Methods Morbidity classes were identified through latent class analyses in two Dutch survey datasets, focusing on depression and alexithymia (DA-dataset; N = 671) and lifestyle factors (L-dataset; N = 1022). Linear regression analyses were used to assess interoceptive accuracy and attention (by the Interoceptive Accuracy Scale and Interoceptive Attention Scale respectively) among different subgroups. Results Multimorbid subgroups were characterized by older age, low socioeconomic position, and elevated physical, psychological, and behavioral problems. Multimorbid classes exhibited lower interoceptive accuracy (DA-dataset: B = -1.14, 95% CI = [-2.89, 0.62]; L-dataset: B = -2.36, 95% CI = [-3.83, -0.89]) and higher attention (DA-dataset: B = 3.62, 95% CI = [0.97, 6.27]; L-dataset: B = 1.07, 95% CI = [-1.42, 3.56]) compared to healthier classes. Conclusion Multimorbid populations demonstrated lower interoceptive accuracy and higher interoceptive attention. This highlights the psychosocial complexity of multimorbid populations which may impact their self-management and health behavior. These findings underscore the need to expand treatments to include psychosocial domains for multimorbid patients.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Major Depression Polygenic Risk Scores to Explore the Depressive Symptom Continuum 95%
- A Comparison of Pruning During Multi-Step Planning in Depressed and Healthy Individuals 94%
- Social relationships and depression during the COVID-19 lockdown: longitudinal analysis of the COVID-19 social study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote virtual reality assessment elucidates self-blame-related action tendencies in depression 94%
- Clinical properties of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire: Development of a free calculator based on a Brazilian High-Risk Cohort Study 94%
- Mental health, gender, and care-seeking behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden: An exploratory study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire in young adulthood 95%
- Which traits predict elevated distress during the Covid-19 pandemic? Results from a large, longitudinal cohort study with psychiatric patients and healthy controls 94%
- Strong Genetic Overlaps Between Dimensional and Categorical Models of Bipolar Disorders in a Family Sample 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Big Five personality traits and CNS arousal in the resting state 91%
- The impact of dance movement interventions on psychological health in older adults without dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
- Recalled parental bonding interacts with oxytocin receptor gene polymorphism in modulating anxiety and avoidance in adult relationships 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential associations between SARS-CoV-2 infection, perceived burden of the pandemic and mental health in the German population-based cohort for digital health research 94%
- The prevalence, incidence and risk factors of mental health problems and mental health services use before and 9 months after the COVID-19 outbreak among the general Dutch population. A 3-wave prospective study 94%
- Functional Disability, Health Care Access, and Mental Health in Ukrainians Displaced by the 2022 Russian Invasion 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.