Back

Interoceptive accuracy and attention across multimorbidity classes: A latent class analysis

Mulder, J.; Boeker, C. M.; Smit, A. K.; Kiefte-de Jong, J. C.

2026-06-09 public and global health
10.64898/2026.06.08.26355147 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Multimorbidity is increasingly prevalent, and associated with worse clinical and psychosocial burdens. Interoception, the brain's ability to sense and interpret internal bodily signals, may contribute to multimorbidity, through its link with health behaviors, stress regulation, and mental health. This study examines whether self-reported interoceptive accuracy and attention is associated with multimorbidity, by identifying multimorbid subgroups and their interoceptive profiles. Methods Morbidity classes were identified through latent class analyses in two Dutch survey datasets, focusing on depression and alexithymia (DA-dataset; N = 671) and lifestyle factors (L-dataset; N = 1022). Linear regression analyses were used to assess interoceptive accuracy and attention (by the Interoceptive Accuracy Scale and Interoceptive Attention Scale respectively) among different subgroups. Results Multimorbid subgroups were characterized by older age, low socioeconomic position, and elevated physical, psychological, and behavioral problems. Multimorbid classes exhibited lower interoceptive accuracy (DA-dataset: B = -1.14, 95% CI = [-2.89, 0.62]; L-dataset: B = -2.36, 95% CI = [-3.83, -0.89]) and higher attention (DA-dataset: B = 3.62, 95% CI = [0.97, 6.27]; L-dataset: B = 1.07, 95% CI = [-1.42, 3.56]) compared to healthier classes. Conclusion Multimorbid populations demonstrated lower interoceptive accuracy and higher interoceptive attention. This highlights the psychosocial complexity of multimorbid populations which may impact their self-management and health behavior. These findings underscore the need to expand treatments to include psychosocial domains for multimorbid patients.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
2
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
5
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.9%
10
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
11
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
13
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
30
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%