Back

The polygenic risk score and inter-familial heterogeneity in multigenerational families affected by schizophrenia and bipolar disorder

Ricard, J.; Dubeau, A.; Moreau, C.; Boisvert, M.-C.; Maziade, M.; Bureau, A.; Girard, S. L.

2026-06-08 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.06.08.26354912 medRxiv
Show abstract

In the past two decades, the focus on genome-wide association studies in large samples of unrelated patients has overshadowed family genetic studies. Therefore, little is still known about the levels and effects of the transmission of polygenic risk scores (PRS) among familial cases of schizophrenia (SZ) or bipolar disorder (BD) and their unaffected relatives. Prior research has shown that PRS are elevated in both patients and young individuals at familial risk for BD and SZ. We sought to study the transmission of PRS in affected multigenerational families and non-affected adult relatives (NAARs) with or without other non-mood nonpsychotic DSM-IV diagnoses and unrelated non-affected individuals from the same population. We genotyped 1,117 participants divided in 48 families from the Eastern Quebec Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder Kindreds. PRSs for both SZ and BD were computed using Multivariate Lassosum. For both SZ PRS and BD PRS, SZ and BD cases present higher PRS compared to controls, replicating previous findings. Regardless of a diagnosis of other non-psychotic and non-mood conditions, NAARs presented higher PRS than the unrelated cohort. Crucially, a subset of families presented consistently low PRS transmission profiles across generations, falling below expectations from our polygenic inheritance model. When the effect of individual PRs is accounted for, we observed sex-specific associations between familial PRS and patients' symptom dimensions. Our results clearly demonstrate that polygenic inheritance alone does not adequately explain disease transmission in families. Such an approach may also clarify why some families exhibit dense clustering of cases despite minimal polygenic burden.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.