Primary care practitioners preconception health literacy and information-seeking: A cross-sectional survey.
Caut, C.; Schoenaker, D.; McIntyre, E.; Steel, A.
Show abstract
Background Parental health before pregnancy influences maternal and child outcomes. Primary care professionals, including general practitioners [GPs], midwives, and naturopaths, can provide preconception care, yet many report limited knowledge and difficulty accessing relevant information. This study described Australian GPs, midwives, and naturopaths preconception health literacy, including knowledge and ability to access information. Methods Between July and September 2022, Australian GPs, midwives, and naturopaths completed a 32-item online cross-sectional survey. Participants were recruited through professional associations, and data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics Results Participants (N=373) included naturopaths (40.7%), GPs (32.4%), and midwives (26.8%). Reported barriers to clinician health literacy including lack of preconception care resources (25.5%), and limited clinician knowledge (23.6%). The proportion identifying limited clinician knowledge differed significantly between professions (GP: 31.4%; midwives: 23.0%; naturopaths: 17.8%; p=0.030). The highest level of accurate knowledge regarding preconception exposures was for pre-pregnancy obesity (82.7%), while low birth weight was the most accurately identified preconception outcomes (83.7%). Incorrect responses were most common for maternal multivitamin use as an exposure (28.3%) and childhood leukaemia as an outcome (26.3%). Differences between professions were strongest for infant outcomes, with moderate associations observed for shoulder dystocia (V=.2355), precipitous labour (V=.2173), macrosomia (V=.2060), labour dystocia (V=.2018) and cryptorchidism (V=.2018). Discussion Preconception health literacy varies across primary care professions. Clinicians require greater access to targeted resources and education tailored to their differing scopes of practice and experience. Improving clinician preconception health literacy may strengthen consistent evidence-based care and support better maternal, child, and long-term family health outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 94%
- Advancing the Safe Motherhood Initiative: a qualitative and sentiment analysis of local physician’s perspectives on antibiotic self-medication during pregnancy in a low- and middle-income country 94%
- “ She helped from the first minute to the last ” – experiences of respectful maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nampula Province, Mozambique 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population birth outcomes in 2020 and experiences of expectant mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a ‘Born in Wales’ mixed methods study using routine data 95%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 95%
- How do perceptions of Covid-19 risk impact pregnancy-related health decisions? A convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Women’s knowledge, attitudes and views of preconception health and intervention delivery methods: A cross-sectional survey 97%
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 95%
- A Cross-Sectional Survey Of Australian Women'S Perspectives And Experiences Of Exercise During Pregnancy, Including Women That Experience Mental Illness 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The health beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of males toward pregnancy planning and preconception health and care: a systematic review. 95%
- How, why and when are delayed (back-up) antibiotic prescriptions used in primary care? A realist review integrating concepts of uncertainty in healthcare 92%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and well-being of people living with a long-term physical health condition: a qualitative study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Desire to Avoid Pregnancy Scale: clinical considerations and comparison with other questions about pregnancy preferences 94%
- Attitudes towards the regulation and provision of abortion among healthcare professionals in Britain; cross sectional survey data from the SACHA study 94%
- Access and quality of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.