Back

Detecting transcriptional responses and comparing the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cystic fibrosis isolates in a mung bean model

Franco Ortega, S.; Herman, E.; Kyrkou, I.; Johansen, H. K.; Moir, J. W. B.; Mahon, C. S.; Friman, V. P.

2026-06-06 microbiology
10.64898/2026.06.06.729815 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A mung bean infection model has previously been shown to differentiate between non-virulent and virulent Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria. However, it remains unclear how plant and bacteria adjust their gene expression during infection and whether the mung bean model can be used to compare the virulence of clinical cystic fibrosis (CF) P. aeruginosa lung isolates. Here, we first explored temporal transcriptomics of P. aeruginosa PAO1 and mung bean during an infection. We found that bacterial gene expression followed temporal changes, with an increase in the expression of O-antigen biosynthetic genes, chemotaxis, phosphate intake and phenazine production. Mung bean responded by upregulating genes associated with defence mechanisms and downregulating genes involved in the plant development. From the PAO1 perspective, the core-transcriptomic responses in the mung bean were similar to its responses previously observed in wound and excision and in in vitro media and sputum models, while differed from those observed in the bronchial cell model. Furthermore, we used the mung bean to assess the virulence of 119 clinical P. aeruginosa CF strains originating from the Copenhagen CF clinic. By quantifying bacterial virulence as a reduction in root and shoot growth and weight of the seeds, we found that CF strains isolated at later compared to early stages of lung infections showed higher virulence. This difference corresponded with the higher number of immune modulation-associated virulence genes and lower number of motility and effector genes, present in the genomes of late compared to early isolated CF strains. IMPORTANCEOur results demonstrate that based on PAO1 transcriptional profile, the mung bean model is similar to in vitro and wound infection models but differs from cell and bronchial models. Moreover, the mung bean model can detect virulence differences between clinical P. aeruginosa CF strains, making it a potentially useful high-throughput in vivo model for bacterial virulence screening.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 1%
15.1%
2
ERJ Open Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.9%
4
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.9%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.3%
6
Microbiology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
8
Microbiological Research
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
9
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
12
Journal of Medical Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
MicrobiologyOpen
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
15
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
17
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Molecular Plant Pathology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
19
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
20
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Journal of Applied Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
23
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
Microbial Pathogenesis
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Journal of Fungi
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Plant Pathology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
27
Journal of Bacteriology
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.6%
29
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%