All signals considered: Data quality partially explains inter-individual task differences in a large, open fNIRS dataset

SignificanceHigh inter-subject variability and limited reproducibility in functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) research may partly reflect global systemic physiology and signal quality differences, possibly distorting task-evoked hemodynamic responses. AimWe investigate how signal quality relates to inter-subject variability in motor-task fNIRS responses and introduce a large, open, multi-task, near whole-head fNIRS dataset with extensive peripheral physiology and short-channel recordings. ApproachFifty-seven participants completed resting-state, motor action, motor imagery, emotion recognition, visual, and auditory tasks during fNIRS recording. Peripheral measures included pulse oximetry, heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, respiration, room temperature, galvanic skin response, electrocardiogram, and electromyography. Signal quality was assessed using the scalp coupling index (SCI), coefficient of variation (CV), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and a spectral measure here coined the coupling SNR (cSNR). ResultsQuality metrics were weakly to moderately correlated, except SNR and CV, which showed the expected inverse relationship. All quality metrics were significantly related to channel length and associated with task-related activation estimates. Group-level analyses validated activation in expected task-related regions. ConclusionsThe assessed metrics capture complementary features of fNIRS signal quality and may help explain individual activation differences. The dataset provides a comprehensive, open resource enabling future evaluation of physiological correction methods and confound mitigation.