Back

Modelling the public-health impact of indoor air quality interventions on respiratory virus transmission

Howes, A.; Jeyapragasan, G.; Williamson, R.; Carel, D.; Koos, H.; Swett, J. L.; Montavon, J.; Belenky, V.; Lietar, P.; Fitzjohn, R.; Charles, G.; Chang, S.; Brewer, T.; Whittaker, C.

2026-06-15 public and global health
10.64898/2026.06.06.26355067 medRxiv
Show abstract

Respiratory virus transmission occurs in indoor settings where ventilation, occupancy, and dwell time determine exposure levels. Improving indoor air quality (IAQ) therefore could help reduce disease burden associated with respiratory viruses, yet its population-level impact remains poorly quantified. Here, we develop an individual-based transmission modelling framework that links within-location airborne dynamics to individual infection risk and population-level spread, whilst explicitly incorporating heterogeneity in ventilation and baseline indoor air quality across locations. We use this modelling approach to evaluate IAQ-improving interventions (air-quality interventions or AQIs), using hypothetical endemic and pandemic pathogen archetypes with properties similar to SARS-CoV-2 and influenza, and evaluate how effects on key epidemiological metrics (such as annualized incidence and epidemic final size) depend on AQI coverage, efficacy and allocation strategy. At 20% AQI intervention coverage and 80% efficacy, annualized incidence was reduced by approximately 7.2% for an endemic 'SARS-CoV-2-like' respiratory virus, and 17.0% for an endemic 'influenza-like' virus; at 60% coverage (80% efficacy) the reductions were 26.3% and 56.4%, respectively. Targeting AQI installation to the highest-risk locations outperformed random allocation: for SARS-CoV-2-like transmission, 20% coverage at 80% efficacy cut absolute incidence by 10.8% when targeted versus 7.2% when random; for influenza-like transmission, this comparison was 28.9% versus 17.0%. In epidemic scenarios, random installation at 40% coverage and 60% efficacy reduced final size by 23.7% (influenza-like) versus 6.3% (SARS-CoV-2-like). These results support treating clean indoor air as core public-health infrastructure and prioritising risk-based deployment of IAQ-improving interventions to maximise population-level benefit within budgetary and operational constraints.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.4%
2
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
3
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.3%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.3%
5
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
6
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
8
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
9
GeoHealth
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
10
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
12
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
15
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
17
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.5%
20
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
Thorax
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
23
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
24
Swiss Medical Weekly
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.1%
26
Journal of Travel Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
27
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
28
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
29
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%