Stigmatization of Indigenous patients in healthcare: Co-development and validation of a measurement tool
Tremblay, M.-C.; Iradukunda, E.; Cassivi, C.; Breault, P.; Briere, E.; Collerette, C.; Fletcher, C.; Renaud, J.-S.; Beaulieu, M.
Show abstract
Introduction Indigenous peoples in Canada face persistent health inequities rooted in colonialism, systemic racism, discrimination and social exclusion, all of which operate with particular intensity within healthcare institutions. Despite a growing qualitative literature documenting the discrimination and stigmatisation of Indigenous people by healthcare professionals, no validated instrument existed in the Canadian context to measure the stigmatizing attitudes and behaviors of clinicians toward this population. Aim This study aimed to co-develop and validate an instrument using clinical case vignettes designed to capture the affective, cognitive, and behavioral dimensions of stigmatization of indigenous peoples. Method Following Boateng et al.'s three-phase scale development approach, a multidisciplinary team including Indigenous patient partners, researchers, clinicians, and measurement experts generated 244 items across three paired clinical vignettes addressing type 2 diabetes, chronic back pain, and depressive disorder. Each vignette was developed in two versions, one featuring an Indigenous patient (test) and one featuring a non-Indigenous patient (control), distinguished solely by name and origin. Content validity was assessed by an expert committee using a Content Validity Index. The instrument was subsequently administered to a sample of nurses and physicians from two canadian health institutions using a twelve-arm randomization design. Analyses were carried to assess the internal structure of the instrument, convergent and concurrent validity as well as internal consistency. Results Our results show that the instrument developed has good psychometric qualities, particularly in terms of internal consistency, concurrent validity and factor structure, which reflects the theoretical structure assumed. Concurrent validity of the tool with the M-PATAS scale demonstrated weak to moderate significant correlations. Developed through a participatory process centering Indigenous expertise and lived experience, this instrument constitutes a significant methodological advance in the study of racialized stigmatization in Canadian healthcare.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-Rehabilitation Strategy for Rural Community-dwelling Stroke Survivors in a Lower-Middle Income Country: A Delphi Study 96%
- High prevalence of burnout syndrome among medical and nonmedical residents during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Family Vulnerability Scale: evidence of content and internal structure validity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perspectives on health, illness, disease and management approaches among traditional health care spiritualists in Central Uganda 94%
- Corona virus fear among health workers during the early phase of pandemic response in Nepal: a web-based cross-sectional study 94%
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 94%
- Psychological, social and financial impact of COVID-19 on culturally and linguistically diverse communities: a cross-sectional Australian study 94%
- A conceptual model for pluralistic healthcare behavior: results from a qualitative study in southwestern Uganda 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 94%
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 94%
- Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in rural Odisha, India: knowledge, preventative actions, and impacts on daily life 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Medical overuse in the Iranian healthcare system: a systematic scoping review and practical recommendations for decreasing medical overuse during unexpected COVID-19 pandemic opportunity 92%
- Community Perception and Attitude towards people with schizophrenia among residents of Arba Minch Zuria District, Arba Minch Health and Demographic Surveillance System sites (AM-HDSS), Ethiopia. Cross-section study. 92%
- Increased levels of anxiety among medical and non-medical university students during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Arab Emirates. 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.