Back

Single-cell gene regulatory network reconstruction and key regulator identification using a dual-channel fusion graph convolutional network

Tang, R.; Liu, J.; Zhang, P.; Liang, X.

2026-06-07 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.05.730394 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background and objectiveGene regulatory networks are formed by complex regulatory relationships between transcription factors and their target genes. A systematic understanding of these regulatory relationships is crucial for deciphering the molecular mechanisms that underlie cell state transitions under physiological and pathological conditions. Single-cell expression data can reveal cell-type-specific transcriptional regulation, and computational methods have recently been developed to infer gene regulatory networks from single-cell transcriptomics and prior regulatory knowledge. However, existing methods could not explore the common and specific information in expression correlations and prior regulatory knowledge, which can adversely affect prediction performance. MethodsWe propose a novel method for inferring gene regulatory networks from single-cell RNA sequencing data. The proposed method consists of dual-channel graph neural networks and a weight-shared common graph neural network, enabling effective fusion of prior regulatory knowledge with gene co-expression patterns. Furthermore, we formulate a new computational framework built upon the proposed algorithm, which integrates differential gene expression profiles and regulatory changes to identify key regulators that distinguish different cell states. ResultsExperimental results demonstrate that our method significantly improves the accuracy of regulatory inference across multiple datasets, outperforming other state-of-the-art approaches. Our method also exhibits robustness to noise and missing data. Analysis of two single-cell expression datasets suggests that the proposed framework could help identify key regulators involved in tumor metastasis and drug resistance. ConclusionThese results indicate that the proposed method could advance the understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying diseases by reconstructing single-cell gene regulatory networks and identifying key regulators across different cell states.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.9%
2
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
11.8%
3
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.9%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
7
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
8
Journal of Computational Biology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
10
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
11
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
16
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Quantitative Biology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Computational Biology and Chemistry
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%