Auditory Working Memory and Sound Segregation Ability Predict Speech-in-Noise in Adult Cochlear Implant Users

ObjectivesOutcomes following cochlear implantation vary substantially across adult recipients, and the cognitive and perceptual factors contributing to this variability are not fully understood. This poses a challenge for developing strategies to improve cochlear implant outcomes, as such approaches require a clearer understanding of the mechanisms underlying individual listening difficulties. In this study, we investigated auditory cognitive measures in cochlear implant (CI) users to further elucidate the origins of this variability. DesignThirty-seven adult cochlear implant users completed measures of auditory cognition, comprising auditory working memory (AWM) and sound segregation ability, measured using an auditory figure-ground task (AFG), as well as measures of peripheral temporal and spectral processing, comprising the temporal modulation detection threshold (TMDT) and spectral ripple discrimination threshold (SRDT). Speech perception outcomes were assessed using word-in-noise (WIN) and sentence-in-noise (SIN) tasks. Separate multiple linear regression models evaluated the unique contribution of the auditory cognition measures to WIN and SIN performance, after accounting for the peripheral measures. ResultsBoth regression models explained a substantial proportion of variance in speech-in-noise outcomes (WIN: adjusted R{superscript 2} = 0.55; SIN: adjusted R{superscript 2}=0.57, both p < 0.001). For WIN performance, AFG and AWM were significant predictors. A similar pattern was found for SIN performance, where lower AWM ability and poorer AFG segregation were linked to poorer sentence listening in noise. No significant effects of spectral ripple discrimination or temporal modulation detection were observed in either model, even though both were significantly correlated with WIN performance. ConclusionsThese findings indicate that auditory working memory and sound segregation ability are robust predictors of speech-in-noise outcomes in adult cochlear implant users, across both word- and sentence-level measures. Together, the results may help explain why speech-in-noise outcomes remain highly variable among CI users, even when basic sensory encoding abilities are taken into account. Incorporating measures of auditory working memory and fundamental sound segregation may therefore improve outcome prediction and help in developing more individualised rehabilitation strategies.