GLOF: A large-scale expert-curated benchmark dataset of gain-of-function and loss-of-function missense variants
Maricato, V.; Schlesinger, D.; de Souza Moura, P. N.
Show abstract
Distinguishing loss-of-function (LOF) from gain-of-function (GOF) effects of missense variants is fundamental to understanding disease mechanisms and guiding therapeutic strategy, yet no large-scale, expert-curated benchmark has been publicly available for this task. Here we present GLOF (Gain and Loss Of Function), a dataset of 112,399 missense variants across 2,809 human genes, each classified as LOF, GOF, or neutral by board-certified clinical geneticists following ACMG guidelines. Pathogenic variants were sourced from ClinVar and annotated with their functional mechanism based on published functional studies, phenotype correlations, and established gene-disease relationships. Neutral variants were drawn from gnomAD v3.1 and validated against v4.1 using stringent population frequency filters. The dataset spans diverse protein families, includes 97 genes with bidirectional mechanisms (containing both LOF and GOF variants), and has been validated against well-characterized variants in the literature. GLOF is publicly available on Kaggle (https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/maricatovictor/loss-and-gain-of-function-variants) and Hugging Face (https://huggingface.co/datasets/victormaricato/glof), and provides a standardized resource for developing and benchmarking computational methods that predict variant functional mechanisms.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome sequencing reveals the impact of non-canonical exon inclusions in rare genetic disease 95%
- Towards robust clinical genome interpretation: developing a consistent terminology to characterize disease-gene relationships - allelic requirement, inheritance modes and disease mechanisms 95%
- Estimating diagnostic noise in panel-based genomic analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Beyond gene-disease validity: capturing structured data on inheritance, allelic-requirement, disease-relevant variant classes, and disease mechanism for inherited cardiac conditions 94%
- Clustering of predicted loss-of-function variants in genes linked with monogenic disease can explain incomplete penetrance 94%
- Mendelian gene identification through mouse embryo viability screening 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Proteome-scale prediction of molecular mechanisms underlying dominant genetic diseases 94%
- Curated Multiple Sequence Alignment for the Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) Gene and Accuracy of In Silico Pathogenicity Predictions 94%
- Phenogenon: Gene to Phenotype Associations for Rare Genetic Diseases 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- REVEL is better at predicting pathogenicity of loss-of-function than gain-of-function variants 94%
- Structure-informed classification of RyR1 variants highlights limitations of current predictors and enables clinical interpretation 94%
- AutoPVS1: An automatic classification tool for PVS1 interpretation of null variants 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mutation severity spectrum of rare alleles in the human genome is predictive of disease type 95%
- Large scale analyses of genotype-phenotype relationships of glycine decarboxylase mutations and neurological disease severity. 94%
- GenOtoScope: Towards automating ACMG classification of variants associated with congenital hearing loss 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.