A policy for delivery of essential medicines to vulnerable population in Argentina: a case study of the REMEDIAR program
Havela, M.; Bartolomeu, L.; Rubinstein, A.
Show abstract
Essential medicines are one of the cornerstones of financial protection and health equity. The REMEDIAR Program is an initiative of the Argentine Ministry of Health aimed at ensuring free access to essential medicines for the uninsured at the point of care in primary healthcare centers (PHC). This study analyzes the financing, procurement, and distribution of this program over two decades (2002 to 2024). It evaluates how the program's capacity to navigate economic and political challenges ensured an uninterrupted supply of essential drugs at the primary healthcare level in a federal country where health services are devolved to provinces. We adopted a mixed-methods approach to examine the duality between international concessional loans and domestic treasury funding. Findings reveal that while international financing enhanced predictability and efficiency, reducing procurement timelines from 458 to 235 days, it also constrained domestic planning through external conditionalities. Conversely, while national centralized procurement achieved superior price efficiency and lower dispersion, it faced rigidities in adapting to local needs. Territorial distribution analysis confirms that REMEDIAR reduced access barriers for vulnerable households without formal insurance. However, the program entered a stabilization phase, failing to consolidate robust coordination with subnational policies, becoming entrenched in its own operational logic. The study concludes that program effectiveness depends not only on resource volume but on management quality. To guarantee long-term sustainability, transition to national financing requires profound institutional redesign. This must integrate operational capacities with federal coordination and domestic regulations, ensuring that the primary healthcare supply chain remains resilient to macroeconomic volatility and political shifts, aligned with sub-national strategies.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Access to essential medicines for noncommunicable diseases during conflicts: the case cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and epilepsy in Northern Syria 94%
- Drug Supply Management at First-level Public Health Facilities: Case of Pyay District, Myanmar 93%
- Examining National Health Insurance Fund Members’ preferences and trade-offs for the attributes of contracted outpatient facilities in Kenya: a discrete choice experiment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Revisiting the use and effectiveness of patient-held records in rural Malawi 91%
- The Impact for implementing Balanced Scorecard in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review 91%
- A microplanning strategy to improve door-to-door health service delivery: The case of Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention in Sub-Saharan African villages 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The health sector cost of different policy responses to COVID-19 in low- and middle- income countries 92%
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and response on the utilisation of health services during the first wave in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo 91%
- Geographic barriers to establishing a successful hospital referral system in rural Madagascar 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Extent and causes of the collapse in the registration of innovative medications in Lebanon: A mixed-methods analysis 93%
- The effect of recall period on reported out-of-pocket health expenditure in Ghana 92%
- Analysis of the Health Economics Portfolio Funded by the National Institutes of Health in Response to Published Guidance 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.