Back

A Decade of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's FluSight Influenza Forecasting

Hines, A. G.; Mathis, S. M.; Johansson, M. A.; Biggerstaff, M.; Reed, C.; Borchering, R.

2026-06-08 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.06.05.26354941 medRxiv
Show abstract

Since the U.S. 2013/14 influenza season, the CDC's FluSight Challenge has provided a platform for evaluating influenza forecasting models and fostering collaboration across institutions. The Challenge aims to improve the science and enhance the utility of infectious disease forecasts for public health decision making. We analyzed ten years of submitted forecasts (2014/15-2019/20 (influenza-like illness seasons) and 2021/22-2024/25 (hospital admissions seasons)) across a range of model types, including statistical, mechanistic, machine learning, and hybrid models. Influenza-like illness (ILI) forecasts were evaluated using the exponentiated logarithmic score (skill metric) while hospital admissions forecasts were evaluated using the log transformed relative Weighted Interval Score. Corresponding potential performance differences were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and associations with team participation history were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation. Model performance varied by season, and no single model type consistently outperformed others. In ILI seasons, statistical models generally performed better than mechanistic and machine learning models, though consistent differences were not observed in more recent hospital admissions seasons. Ensemble forecasts showed better overall performance across seasons, and the CDC's FluSight ensemble ranked among the top-performing forecasts every year. We also found a positive correlation between forecast accuracy and the number of years a team participated in the Challenge, with statistically significant associations in four seasons. These findings highlight the benefits of ensemble approaches and sustained engagement in improving forecasting performance, while also underscoring the continued value of forecast evaluation before and following the COVID-19 pandemic. Insights from the FluSight Challenge can guide future infectious disease forecasting efforts and support more effective public health preparedness.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.2%
2
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.1%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
6
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 21%
3.5%
9
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
11
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
13
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
16
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%