Healthy Heart Actions Right Time (HHART): Co-design priorities to connect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community and clinic activities for healthy hearts
Wyber, R.; Zagler, J.; Liu, C.; Yadav, U. N.; O'Dwyer, Z.; Hart, K.; Chapman, K.; McGrady, L.; Kohn, A.; Winterfield, N.; Williams, D.; Watson, N.; Morey, K.; Pearson, O.
Show abstract
Aim: Healthy Heart Actions Right Time (HHART) is a multi-phased research project that seeks to identify, implement and evaluate strategies to connect community and clinical activities to reduce the burden of heart disease for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. The aim in Phase One was to identify priority activities for two participating services. Background: The ongoing effects of colonisation drive a disproportionate burden of heart disease for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Clinical and community groups both have established strengths in reducing the risk of heart disease, but these are not always well connected. Methods: Using a case study methodology in two locations we partnered in a 12-month co-design process to identify priority activities to connect clinical and community activities. Findings: Three priorities emerged from the Phase One co-design process: (i) community-led gardening as a strategy to promote heart health through connection and healthy lifestyles; (ii) community days to increase engagement in heart checks and strengthen community-clinic relationship; and (iii) clinic-led development of culturally relevant education resources to promote clinician confidence and community heart health knowledge.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability of a community health worker- led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients in the City of Harare, Zimbabwe 96%
- Community-orientated primary health care: exploring the interface between community health worker programmes, the health system and communities in South Africa 95%
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- “Putting the power back into community”: A mixed methods evaluation of a chronic hepatitis B training course for the Aboriginal health workforce of Australia’s Northern Territory 95%
- ‘The illness isn’t the end of the road’ - Patient perspectives on the initiation of and early participation in a multi-disease, community-based exercise programme 94%
- A community-based mentoring scheme for pregnant and parenting adolescents in Sierra Leone: protocol for a hybrid pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 96%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 94%
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity: A qualitative study 93%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 93%
- Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 92%
- Impact of COVID-19 on Migrants’ Access to Primary Care: A National Qualitative Study 92%
- Factors influencing focused practice: A qualitative study of resident and early-career family physician practice choices 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.