Back

A Facile and Versatile Technique for Creating Antifibrotic Coatings on Biomedical Implants

Liu, Y.; Edvall, C.; Chakraborty, S.; Anand, A.; Agus, J.; Bose, S.

2026-06-09 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.04.730237 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Foreign body response is a common yet serious challenge for biomedical implants. It can trigger inflammation and eventually lead to the formation of a fibrotic capsule, which compromises device function. Although significant efforts have been made to develop antifibrotic surface coatings for implantable materials, developing broadly applicable solutions remains challenging due to the diversity of materials used in biomedical implants. Here, we propose a simple and versatile strategy to develop antifibrotic coatings for biomedical implants. Photoreactive benzophenone groups are incorporated into designer polymers to enable covalent attachment to various substrates. The effect of benzophenone group density within polymer chains on surface coating efficiency was investigated, and an optimal BP incorporation ratio was identified. Polymers incorporating varying ratios of an anti-fibrotic small molecule and anti-fouling zwitterionic moieties were synthesized and successfully attached to silicone implants. In vivo evaluation of these implants in C57BL/6 mice identified an optimized polymer composition that reduced fibrotic capsule thickness by around 60%. Coating of commercial medical catheters with this optimized polymer reduced collagen deposition by over 3.5-fold following 4 weeks of implantation in the peritoneal space of C57BL/6 mice. Finally, we demonstrated that the optimized polymer coating can be readily applied to a variety of commonly used biomedical materials using this straightforward method, highlighting the versatility of the approach. This work provides a facile and broadly applicable strategy for developing antifibrotic coatings, which has the potential to expand the design of surface modifications aimed at improving the performance of biomedical implants.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.7%
2
Advanced Functional Materials
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
3
Advanced Materials Technologies
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.3%
6
ACS Applied Bio Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
7
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
8
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
9
Bioactive Materials
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
11
Materials Today Bio
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
12
Biofabrication
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
13
Langmuir
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
14
Biomaterials Science
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
15
Biomaterials Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
18
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.7%
20
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.6%
21
Advanced Materials
56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
22
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.1%
23
Chemical Engineering Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
24
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
26
RSC Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
27
Advanced Therapeutics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
28
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
29
Nanoscale
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
30
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%