Back

Comparative Evaluation of DDA and DIA Based Proteomic Workflows in Beryllium Related Lung Disease

Weise, D. O.; Gupta, K.; Griffin, T. J.; Jagtap, P. D.; Mroz, M. M.; Wagner, R.; Macaluso, J. D.; Mehta, S.; Maier, L. A.; Li, L.; Vestal, B. E.; Bhargava, M.

2026-06-09 systems biology
10.64898/2026.06.04.730108 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We compared traditional data-dependent acquisition mass spectrometry (DDA-MS) with the increasingly adopted data-independent acquisition (DIA-MS) to evaluate their relative utility for large-scale quantitative biofluid proteomics of lung compartments, specifically paired bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cells and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Using beryllium-related granulomatous lung disease as a focused model, we analyzed BALF and BAL cells from beryllium-sensitized (BeS) individuals using both acquisition strategies to assess proteome depth, quantitative completeness, and analytical robustness. In BAL cells, 5,640 proteins were identified by DDA-MS and 5,227 by DIA-MS; however, DIA-MS yielded markedly improved quantitative completeness, with 5,178 proteins ([~]99%) quantified across all samples compared with 3,539 ([~]63%) quantified by DDA-MS. While 3,397 proteins were quantified by both methods, DIA-MS uniquely quantified 1,781 lower-abundance proteins. Proteins identified by both DIA and DDA-MS approaches revealed pathways associated with granulomatous inflammation, including Toll-like receptor, clathrin-mediated endocytosis, sirtuin, and C-type lectin receptor signaling, whereas DIA-MS resolved additional pathways, such as the complement cascade, coagulation system, and JAK/IL-6-type cytokine signaling. In BALF, although more proteins were identified by DDA-MS than by DIA-MS (2,069 vs 1,742), DIA-MS achieved greater quantitative completeness, with 1,695 proteins quantified across all samples compared with 1,050 using DDA-MS, underscoring its suitability for biomarker-oriented analyses in lung fluid compartments. Together, these results support DIA-MS as a robust and sensitive platform for quantitative lung proteomics and discovery of disease-relevant protein signatures.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.8%
2
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
11.8%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.5%
4
PROTEOMICS
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Journal of Proteomics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
6
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
9
Clinical Proteomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
10
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
12
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.8%
14
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
16
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
17
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
18
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
19
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Molecular Omics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
23
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
25
American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.6%