Back

Intra-slide calibration technology improves immunohistochemical harmonization within and between anatomic pathology laboratories

Fernandes, G. M. d. M.; Wang, W.; Parwani, A.; Ahmadian, S. S.; Alves, M. J.; Philips, J. J.; Otero, J. J.

2026-06-08 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.04.730099 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The reproducibility of immunohistochemistry in tumor tissue analysis across reference labs remains a persistent challenge. We tested the extent to which an intra-slide calibration technology mitigated discprepencies in inter-laboratory assays of p53 immunohistochemical (IHC) reactions in brain biopsies of glioblastoma (GB), IDH-wildtype. Intra-slide calibration technologies apply a 0-100% concentration scale incorporating primary surrogate and secondary antibodies to generate a standardized curve for DAB precipitation. IHC from GB samples was performed independently by pathology departments from two different hospital laboratories and were digitalized at 40x magnification using Aperio Image Scope software. Feature extraction, including intensity and texture parameters was performed using the EBImage package in R, followed by UMAP dimensionality reduction and DBSCAN clustering analysis. Our results show significant differences in intensity and texture clustering patterns between laboratory tissue samples and intra-slide calibration technology ruler caused by the different laboratories. Intra-slide calibration technology coupled with polynomial regression analysis improved ~90% the data harmonization. Our findings demonstrate a key role for computational pathology using intra-slide calibration technology to enable intra-laboratory consistency and inter-laboratory reproducibility. These advances strengthen the reproducibility of diagnostic assessments and support more objective, data-driven decision-making in neuro-oncology.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.5%
3
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.7%
4
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
5
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
6
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
7
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
8
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.8%
10
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
14
BMC Methods
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
15
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.4%
17
Journal of Pathology Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
130 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
20
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
25
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
26
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
27
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
30
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%