Back

SHERLOC: An interpretable deep learning model for longitudinal circulating tumor DNA data in survival analysis

MAMANN, A.; Das, J.; Benkirane, H.; Bugiotti, F.; Bernard, E.; Besse, B.; Michiels, S.; Cournede, P.-H.

2026-06-09 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.06.04.730097 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) measurements offer a noninvasive means to monitor treatment response, but clinical trial data present substantial methodological challenges due to high-dimensional short longitudinal ctDNA sequences and limited sample sizes. We introduce SHERLOC, a deep learning framework specifically designed for survival analysis using longitudinal on-treatment ctDNA data, which integrates shared temporal representations of gene-level variant allele frequencies, feature-specific temporal trajectories of panel-level ctDNA biomarkers, and survival-aware genomic representations pre-trained on a large pan-cancer tissue-biopsy dataset (MSK-CHORD), within an interpretable Cox proportional hazards framework. Benchmarked against diverse statistical, ensemble, and deep learning approaches in a non-small-cell lung cancer cohort from the phase III IMpower150 trial, SHERLOC consistently achieved superior survival discrimination and calibration, while remaining interpretable and robust to reductions in the number of available longitudinal liquid biopsy time points per patient. The resulting ctDNA-based risk score provided prognostic information both independent of and complementary to standard radiographic response assessments, and enabled patient stratification within homogeneous RECIST response groups--highlighting its potential as an early, non-invasive decision-support tool to guide treatment adaptation and patient management.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 13%
13.0%
2
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.9%
3
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.9%
5
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
6
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
7
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
9
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
10
Cancer Discovery
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.4%
12
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
13
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
14
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
16
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
17
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
18
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
21
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
22
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
26
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
27
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
28
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
30
EMBO Molecular Medicine
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%