Back

Comparing Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting CFD-Derived Stroke Risk Indicators in Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Melidoro, P.; Cavarra, R.; Mostafa, S.; Lip, G. Y. H.; Klis, M.; Williams, S. E.; Aslanidi, O.; De Vecchi, A.

2026-06-08 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.04.730070 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a five-fold increased risk of stroke, mainly due to impaired contractility of the left atrium (LA) leading to blood stasis and subsequent thrombus formation within the left atrial appendage (LAA). Current AF stroke risk stratification schemes, such as the CHA2DS2-VASc/ CHA2DS2-VA score, use comorbidities and do not capture mechanistic factors like blood flow dynamics and hypercoagulability. To address this, we developed a multiphase computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of the LA, incorporating patient-specific geometries; modelling of the coagulation cascade; and non-Newtonian blood behaviour within the LAA. Using 84 simulation cases generated via Latin Hypercube Sampling of physiological blood parameters and 21 patient-derived LA anatomies, we trained surrogate machine learning models, including Ridge regression, XGBoost, Gaussian Process Emulators (GPEs), and deep learning networks, to predict CFD outputs such as blood viscosity in and fibrin concentrations in the LAA. Deep learning achieved R{superscript 2} values up to 0.90, with the accuracy increasing when both physiological parameters and the raw CT image were included. Other models showed uneven performance with R2 values below 0.7, highlighting the role of nonlinearities between parameters. The study presents a novel CFD model that captures the transition from blood stasis to clot formation, representing the full thrombotic continuum underlying stroke risk in AF, and a deep learning approach to enable efficient prediction of mechanistic outputs of clinical value for stroke risk stratification in AF patients. Author SummaryAtrial fibrillation is a common heart rhythm disorder that greatly increases the risk of stroke. In many patients, blood can pool inside a small pouch of the heart called the left atrial appendage, where clots may form and later travel to the brain. Current clinical tools used to estimate stroke risk mainly rely on a patients medical history and do not directly assess the mechanistic processes that lead to clot formation. In this study, we developed a computer model that simulates how blood flows and clots inside the heart using patient-specific heart anatomies derived from medical imaging. Our model combines blood flow, blood biochemistry, and the changing physical properties of blood during clot formation. We then used machine learning methods to predict these complex simulation results more efficiently. Deep learning models performed best, particularly when both clinical parameters and heart imaging data were included. Our work provides a new way to study the full process linking abnormal blood flow to clot formation in atrial fibrillation. In the future, this approach could support more personalised and mechanistic assessment of stroke risk and help guide treatment decisions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 1%
19.2%
2
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
3
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
4
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.0%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
9
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
15
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
17
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
18
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
19
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
23
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
24
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
25
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
26
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.5%
29
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%