Back

A chromosome-level genome assembly of a "living fossil", the tadpole shrimp Lepidurus arcticus (Pallas, 1793)

Strand, M. A.; Torresen, O. K.; Haga, J. A. R.; Danneels, B.; Skage, M.; Ferrari, G.; Tooming-Klunderud, A.; Hessen, D. O.; Jakobsen, K. S.

2026-06-08 genomics
10.64898/2026.06.04.730062 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We present the first chromosome-level reference genome for Lepidurus arcticus (Pallas, 1793), a freshwater crustacean with circumpolar distribution. L. arcticus belongs to the small order of freshwater Notostracan crustaceans that are representatives of the ancient group Branchiopoda. This group has a remarkable morphological stability and is frequently labelled "living fossils". Its ancient origin, streamlined genome (estimated to 0.11 Gb) and reproductive flexibility makes this a very interesting candidate for genomic studies. The haplotype-resolved assemblies are composed of two pseudo-haplotypes spanning 81.2 megabases (Mb) and 81.8 Mb, respectively, and each scaffolded into 6 chromosomes. Both haplotypes (hap) show high completeness and identical BUSCO scores of 98.3 for hap1 and hap2. The scaffold N50 length is 13.4 Mb for hap1 and 13.9 Mb for hap2, and k-mer completeness estimated from PacBio HiFi reads was 95.79% and 96.18%, respectively. The haplotypes display very low estimated genome-wide heterozygosity of 0.133%. The assembly contains 10901 (hap1) and 10910 (hap2) protein-coding genes. Repetitive elements comprised approximately 24-25% of each haplotype, with long terminal repeat retrotransposons representing the most abundant transposable element class at approximately 8-9%. Comparison with the near chromosome-level genome of Lepidurus packardi revealed substantial intrachromosomal rearrangements, despite similar chromosome numbers and chromosome sizes. Differences in transposable element content between L. arcticus and L. packardi were primarily driven by retrotransposons, particularly LTR and LINE elements. This reference genome provides a valuable resource for future population genomic studies and for investigating evolutionary stasis at the genome level.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.1%
2
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.3%
3
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
7
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
8
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
9
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
Microbiology Resource Announcements
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.4%
15
DNA Research
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
16
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
20
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%
22
Gigabyte
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
24
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%