Back

Immunomodulatory Effects of Insulin-Derived Fibrils from Infusion Pumps: Role of Phenolic Preservatives in Macrophage Activation

Cunegundes, P. S.; Cheng, C.; Wisman, E.; Menkes, D. L.; Klueh, U.

2026-06-09 immunology
10.64898/2026.06.04.726295 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundProtein fibrillation represents a critical challenge in therapeutic insulin delivery, yet the structural determinants and immunological consequences of insulin-derived fibrils (IDFs) formed in the presence of phenolic preservatives remain poorly characterized. ObjectiveThis study investigated the structural characteristics of IDFs formed with (IDF (+)) and without (IDF (-)) phenolic preservatives and elucidated their differential immunomodulatory mechanisms in bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs). MethodsIDF structural properties were characterized using Thioflavin T fluorescence and nanoparticle tracking analysis (Spectradyne nCS1). BMDMs were treated with serial dilutions of IDF (+), IDF (-), or m-cresol. Cytotoxicity, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, MIP-1 levels, and expression of signaling pathways were quantified. ResultsStructural analysis revealed similar aggregation states between IDF (+) and IDF (-). However, IDF (+) induced greater cytotoxicity and ROS production than IDF (-), which produced minimal ROS. Both fibrils increased MIP-1 chemokine levels. Additionally, IDF (-) upregulated NRF2 whereas m-cresol downregulated STAT6 compared to control. Together, these results support the existence of distinct mechanisms of macrophage activation and suggest that protein aggregates can directly induce macrophage responses independent of ROS production. ConclusionsInsulin fibrils activate macrophage inflammatory pathways through ROS-independent mechanisms. Phenolic preservatives enhance fibril cytotoxicity and likely ROS production while differentially modulating inflammatory signaling. These findings suggest that strategies to remove or reduce the effects of IDFs in insulin infusion therapy may increase longevity and biocompatibility of these devices.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomaterials Science
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
3
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Journal of Controlled Release
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.7%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.7%
6
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.7%
7
Biomaterials Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.3%
9
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.5%
11
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.5%
12
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
13
Advanced Therapeutics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
14
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Advanced Functional Materials
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
16
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Biomacromolecules
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
25
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
27
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
28
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%