Back

Who Supports the Caregivers? Perspectives on Mental Health Screening in Paediatrics.

Coscini, N.; Giallo, R.; Grobler, A.; Hiscock, H.; Mulraney, M.; Pope, N.

2026-06-08 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.06.04.26354967 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives To explore caregiver and clinicians perspectives on implementing mental health conversations and supports for caregivers of children with chronic conditions in paediatric outpatient clinics. Specifically, views were sought on (a) screening approaches and measures (phase 1) and (b) how feedback and support could be provided to caregivers experiencing mental health difficulties (phase 2). Methods Caregivers and clinicians from two outpatient clinics (neuromuscular and diabetes) at a tertiary paediatric hospital in Melbourne, Australia participated in online focus groups in July and August 2024. Caregivers were recruited from outpatient clinics and clinicians were recruited via email. Both groups were combined for phase 1 before separating into breakout rooms for phase 2. Two authors conducted reflexive thematic analysis of transcripts using NVivo. Results Sixteen participants (caregivers n = 8; and clinicians n = 8) took part in in two semi-structured focus groups. Analysis generated two overarching domains, each comprising multiple themes. Domain 1, Addressing caregiver mental health, captured themes of overwhelm and invisibility, diverse caregiving roles, and the need for time and resources to support wellbeing conversations. Domain 2, Housing the mental health conversation, encompassed themes of screening preferences, caregiver agency in confidentiality, delivery of feedback, and access to tailored supports. Conclusions Caregivers and clinicians support routine caregiver mental health discussions in paediatric outpatient settings. Caregivers favour screening at diagnosis and key transitions, with clear, and actionable feedback delivered away from the child. Questions about record-keeping warrant further exploration, as do the perspectives of fathers.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
14.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.2%
3
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
6
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
20
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
21
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
23
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%