Back

Elevating the patient perspective: Qualitative evaluation of non-U.S. born care navigation on latent tuberculosis infection screening and treatment adherence

Ramzy, L. M.; Rahman, M.; Luque, M. O.; Rodrigues, K. K.; Belknap, R.; Venci, J. A.; Francis, B.; Ruckard, B. J.; Moran-Ibarra, W.; Rasulo, R. M.; Matadi, A.; Ramirez, M. G.; Thee, P. S.; McFeron, H. D.; Monson, S. P.; For the Tuberculosis Epidemiologic Studies Consortium,

2026-06-08 public and global health
10.64898/2026.06.04.26354954 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the barriers and facilitators experienced by non-U.S. born persons during the diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in primary care settings, including the impact of culturally and linguistically congruent care navigation. Design: 25 interviews with non-U.S. born patients, along with focus groups and surveys with 31 primary care team members and leadership, were conducted. Setting: The study was conducted within a network of Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) clinics. Participants: Participants were adult non-U.S. born patients with LTBI and FQHC care team members. A purposefully selected subsample of randomized participants was interviewed. Intervention: Care navigators followed participants randomized to receive care navigation after a positive test for tuberculosis (TB) infection and offered health navigation and education about the importance of TB screening and treatment. Method: Data collection was followed by thematic analysis guided by a critical ideological paradigm. Results: Culturally and linguistically congruent navigation emerged as central to potentially reducing barriers, fostering trust, and improving treatment continuity. Participants without navigation support reported confusion and disengagement from care, while those with culturally aligned navigators described clarity and comfort, with influence overall by intrinsic motivation, relational support, and culturally shaped beliefs about care. Conclusion: Care navigation that includes culturally and linguistically congruent navigators whenever possible may help increase LTBI treatment completion among non-U.S. born populations. Limitations of the study include the potential influence of cultural norms, power dynamics, and selection bias.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
23.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.0%
3
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.0%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
6
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.0%
7
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
8
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
9
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
10
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
11
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
12
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
13
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
14
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
15
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
16
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
19
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
20
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
28
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
29
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.5%
30
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%