Back

Education/training for health workers/students on inclusive and gender-affirmative care for trans and gender-diverse people: a systematic review

Xia, J.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, G.; Shen, Q.; Su, E.; Schoones, J.; Arcelus, J.; Hu, T.; Xu, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Ye, Z.; Yao, X.

2026-06-05 health policy
10.64898/2026.06.04.26354880 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: Trans and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals often face stigma and discrimination in healthcare, hindering access to gender-affirming care. Training healthcare workers on TGD health aims to foster inclusive and affirming care practices. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of TGD health training programs for healthcare workers. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023443288). We searched 13 databases for studies up to March 2024, with no language/geographic restrictions. Ten reviewers screened studies in pairs, resolving discrepancies via discussion or third-reviewer input. We included randomized/non-randomized comparative and before-after studies for quantitative analysis (mean difference [MD] or standardized mean difference [SMD] with 95% CIs) and qualitative/mixed-methods studies for thematic synthesis. Evidence certainty was assessed using GRADE (quantitative) and GRADE-CERQual (qualitative). Outcomes included knowledge, attitudes, skills, discrimination, competence, comfort, TGD quality of life, and stakeholder preferences. Results: From 20,188 records, 85 studies were included. Training appears to have improved healthcare workers' knowledge (SMD=1.08, 95% CI 0.78-1.39), attitudes (SMD=0.22, 95% CI 0.05-0.39), skills (SMD=0.96, 95% CI 0.56-1.37), competence (SMD=0.55, 95% CI 0.29-0.81), and comfort (SMD=0.69, 95% CI 0.17-1.21). Qualitative analysis of 130 findings identified 18 categories and four key themes on intervention design and impact. Conclusions: TGD training programs may enhance health workers' knowledge, attitudes, skills, competence, and comfort. Well-structured, interactive, and inclusive programs showed promise, but evidence certainty was low with limited follow-up. Further high-quality research is needed to confirm these findings.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
28.0%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
22.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
4
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
5
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
7
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
9
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
10
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
11
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
12
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
13
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
16
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
18
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
22
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%