Scoping national research infrastructure to inform the design and delivery strategy for a platform clinical trial in Parkinsons disease
Petty, R.; Zeissler, M.-L.; Agarwal, V.; Allison, J.; Bartolomeu-Pires, S.; Bartlett, M.; Croucher, R.; Collins, H.; Collins, S.; Davies, E.; Duffen, J.; Ellis-Doyle, R.; Gonzalez-Robles, C.; Inches, J.; Miller, L.; Mills, G.; Wonnacott, S.; Foltynie, T.; Carroll, C.; Mullin, S.; EJS ACT-PD Consortium,
Show abstract
Objective To map national Parkinsons disease (PD) research capability to inform an inclusive delivery strategy for a large-scale clinical trial. Background Few people with PD participate in clinical trials, particularly from under-served populations. The Edmond J Safra Accelerating Clinical Trials in PD initiative (EJS ACT-PD) aims to deliver an inclusive multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) disease modification PD trial. Methods A survey disseminated to National Health Service (NHS) hospitals assessed PD research capability regarding trial experience, rater expertise, trial facilities and specialist investigations. A process was developed to categorise sites into 3 tiers, with tier 1 having the least PD-research capability or experience, and tier 3 being experienced specialist centres. We mapped tiers to PD prevalence, social deprivation and ethnic diversity to identify infrastructure gaps. We developed trial delivery strategies to facilitate rapid and inclusive recruitment. Results Out of 97 survey responses, 43 sites were categorised as tier 1, 33 as tier 2 and 21 as tier 3. Diversity and social deprivation index were higher for tier 3 sites (predominantly urban). A greater proportion of tier 1 and 2 sites were situated in areas of higher PD prevalence (predominantly rural). Ninety one percent of sites reported experience with remote trial delivery methods. Our delivery strategy included: initial trial set-up at tier 3 sites to enable rapid and ethnically diverse recruitment; core funded staff within strategic sites to develop regional solutions for inclusive trial participation and to enable research opportunity provision in areas where currently very little exists, and a hybrid delivery model of in-person and remote study visits, ensuring maximal acceptability and deliverability. Conclusions The mapping of current PD research delivery capability has allowed us to develop a trial delivery strategy that will broaden the provision of research participation opportunity to under-served groups. It has also enabled existing infrastructure to be maximised while mitigating identified gaps.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring how PRIME-Parkinson care is implemented and whether, how and why it produces change, for who and under what conditions: a protocol for an embedded process evaluation within the PRIME-UK randomised controlled trial 97%
- The Australian Parkinson’s Genetics Study (APGS) - pilot (N = 1,532) 92%
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Device-aided therapies (DATs) in Parkinson’s disease (PD). The DATs-PD GETM Spanish Registry Protocol Study 92%
- A qualitative exploration of barriers to efficient and effective Structured Medication Reviews in Primary Care: Findings from the DynAIRx study 92%
- Connecting real-world digital mobility assessment to clinical outcomes for regulatory and clinical endorsement – the Mobilise-D study protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Timely referral for advanced therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Development of a screening tool 93%
- A Pilot Interventional Study on Feasibility and Effectiveness of the CUE1 device in Parkinson’s disease 92%
- Online unsupervised performance-based cognitive testing: a feasible and reliable approach to scalable cognitive phenotyping of Parkinson’s patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using electronic health records to evaluate a children and young people's social prescribing service: Challenges and implications for research and practice 89%
- Quantifying Care, Qualifying Experiences: A Systematic Review of Measurement-Based Care in Psychiatry from Patient and Provider Perspectives 89%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Antidepressant Prescribing with a focus on people with learning disability and autism: An interrupted time-series analysis in England using OpenSAFELY-TPP 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.