Scoping national research infrastructure to inform the design and delivery strategy for a platform clinical trial in Parkinsons disease
Petty, R.; Zeissler, M.-L.; Agarwal, V.; Allison, J.; Bartolomeu-Pires, S.; Bartlett, M.; Croucher, R.; Collins, H.; Collins, S.; Davies, E.; Duffen, J.; Ellis-Doyle, R.; Gonzalez-Robles, C.; Inches, J.; Miller, L.; Mills, G.; Wonnacott, S.; Foltynie, T.; Carroll, C.; Mullin, S.; EJS ACT-PD Consortium,
Show abstract
Objective To map national Parkinsons disease (PD) research capability to inform an inclusive delivery strategy for a large-scale clinical trial. Background Few people with PD participate in clinical trials, particularly from under-served populations. The Edmond J Safra Accelerating Clinical Trials in PD initiative (EJS ACT-PD) aims to deliver an inclusive multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) disease modification PD trial. Methods A survey disseminated to National Health Service (NHS) hospitals assessed PD research capability regarding trial experience, rater expertise, trial facilities and specialist investigations. A process was developed to categorise sites into 3 tiers, with tier 1 having the least PD-research capability or experience, and tier 3 being experienced specialist centres. We mapped tiers to PD prevalence, social deprivation and ethnic diversity to identify infrastructure gaps. We developed trial delivery strategies to facilitate rapid and inclusive recruitment. Results Out of 97 survey responses, 43 sites were categorised as tier 1, 33 as tier 2 and 21 as tier 3. Diversity and social deprivation index were higher for tier 3 sites (predominantly urban). A greater proportion of tier 1 and 2 sites were situated in areas of higher PD prevalence (predominantly rural). Ninety one percent of sites reported experience with remote trial delivery methods. Our delivery strategy included: initial trial set-up at tier 3 sites to enable rapid and ethnically diverse recruitment; core funded staff within strategic sites to develop regional solutions for inclusive trial participation and to enable research opportunity provision in areas where currently very little exists, and a hybrid delivery model of in-person and remote study visits, ensuring maximal acceptability and deliverability. Conclusions The mapping of current PD research delivery capability has allowed us to develop a trial delivery strategy that will broaden the provision of research participation opportunity to under-served groups. It has also enabled existing infrastructure to be maximised while mitigating identified gaps.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.