Back

BREATHE: A realist evaluation protocol to understand how smoking cessation services support pregnant women in areas of social deprivation

Carlisle, N.; Zhang, M.; Simpson, N.; Stacey, T.

2026-06-10 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.06.04.26354590 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Tobacco smoking during pregnancy increases the risk of preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), stillbirth, and longer-term adverse health outcomes. Globally, reducing smoking in pregnancy is a key public health priority, yet the organisation, accessibility, and effectiveness of cessation support varies substantially between countries and healthcare systems. Differences in policy implementation, resource allocation, and integration of cessation services into antenatal care influence uptake and success rates across diverse settings. In England, pregnant women are entitled to free smoking cessation support, however, service delivery varies across regions with mixed efficacy. While tobacco smoking is more prevalent in deprived communities, there is limited understanding of how, why, for whom, and under what circumstances these services are most effective, particularly in areas of social deprivation, such as the North East and Yorkshire. Objective To conduct a realist evaluation to understand how smoking cessation services support pregnant women in areas of social deprivation to stop smoking and reduce adverse perinatal outcomes. Methods This multi-site realist evaluation will be conducted across three NHS maternity services in West Yorkshire, England. The study comprises four iterative stages: (1) development of initial programme theories through realist-informed literature scoping and stakeholder consultation; (2) case study data collection including qualitative interviews with pregnant women (approximately 15-30) and staff (approximately 15-30); (3) analysis of routine anonymised maternity and neonatal electronic data collected over a one-year period; and (4) realist analysis to refine context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations. Qualitative data will be analysed using realist logic supported by NVivo software. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics to explore associations between smoking cessation engagement and perinatal outcomes. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was obtained through the UK Health Research Authority and a Research Ethics Committee prior to study commencement (IRAS 364173; REC reference number 26/SC/0020). Findings will inform recommendations to improve smoking cessation support for pregnant women in deprived areas. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and stakeholder engagement.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
26.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.9%
3
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
4
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
7
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
8
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
10
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
14
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
15
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
19
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
20
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
22
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%