BREATHE: A realist evaluation protocol to understand how smoking cessation services support pregnant women in areas of social deprivation
Carlisle, N.; Zhang, M.; Simpson, N.; Stacey, T.
Show abstract
Background Tobacco smoking during pregnancy increases the risk of preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), stillbirth, and longer-term adverse health outcomes. Globally, reducing smoking in pregnancy is a key public health priority, yet the organisation, accessibility, and effectiveness of cessation support varies substantially between countries and healthcare systems. Differences in policy implementation, resource allocation, and integration of cessation services into antenatal care influence uptake and success rates across diverse settings. In England, pregnant women are entitled to free smoking cessation support, however, service delivery varies across regions with mixed efficacy. While tobacco smoking is more prevalent in deprived communities, there is limited understanding of how, why, for whom, and under what circumstances these services are most effective, particularly in areas of social deprivation, such as the North East and Yorkshire. Objective To conduct a realist evaluation to understand how smoking cessation services support pregnant women in areas of social deprivation to stop smoking and reduce adverse perinatal outcomes. Methods This multi-site realist evaluation will be conducted across three NHS maternity services in West Yorkshire, England. The study comprises four iterative stages: (1) development of initial programme theories through realist-informed literature scoping and stakeholder consultation; (2) case study data collection including qualitative interviews with pregnant women (approximately 15-30) and staff (approximately 15-30); (3) analysis of routine anonymised maternity and neonatal electronic data collected over a one-year period; and (4) realist analysis to refine context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations. Qualitative data will be analysed using realist logic supported by NVivo software. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics to explore associations between smoking cessation engagement and perinatal outcomes. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was obtained through the UK Health Research Authority and a Research Ethics Committee prior to study commencement (IRAS 364173; REC reference number 26/SC/0020). Findings will inform recommendations to improve smoking cessation support for pregnant women in deprived areas. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and stakeholder engagement.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A factorial randomised controlled trial to examine the potential effect of a text-message based intervention on reducing adolescent susceptibility to e-cigarette use: A study protocol 94%
- Weighting of risk factors for low birth weight: A linked routine data cohort study in Wales, UK 94%
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A community-based mentoring scheme for pregnant and parenting adolescents in Sierra Leone: protocol for a hybrid pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 94%
- Population birth outcomes in 2020 and experiences of expectant mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a ‘Born in Wales’ mixed methods study using routine data 94%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Women’s knowledge, attitudes and views of preconception health and intervention delivery methods: A cross-sectional survey 95%
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 94%
- Giving birth in a Pandemic: Women’s Birth Experiences in England during COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 93%
- Advancing the Safe Motherhood Initiative: a qualitative and sentiment analysis of local physician’s perspectives on antibiotic self-medication during pregnancy in a low- and middle-income country 93%
- Improving patient-centred counselling skills among lay healthcare workers in South Africa using the Thusa-Thuso motivational interviewing training and support program 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study investigating the acceptability of cervical screening and self-sampling in postnatal women at 6-week postnatal check-up 93%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 92%
- Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing among un- and under-screened Māori, Pasifika, and Asian women in Aotearoa New Zealand: a preference survey among responders and interviews with clinical-trial non-responders 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.