Back

Refining The Use Of Seed Balls To Support Seagrass Restoration

Potter, H. L. H.; DenHaan, S.; Jones, B. L. H.; Yates, E.; Unsworth, R. K. F.

2026-06-09 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.03.729958 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Seagrass ecosystems are experiencing rapid global decline, and current seed-based restoration efforts are frequently hindered by severe early-life bottlenecks such as decapod predation and bioturbation. To bypass these ecological feedbacks, encasing Zostera marina seeds in protective clay matrices (seed balls) presents a promising, low-cost intermediate technology for scalable deployment. To refine this approach, a mesocosm experiment was conducted to evaluate the physical integrity, germination success, and early shoot development of Z. marina seeds across various clay formulations (fireclay, bentonite, and Kettering loam) and drying treatments. Seed balls were deployed either on the sediment surface or buried, and their performance was evaluated using a hurdle-style generalised additive modelling approach. Results indicated a clear trade-off between structural robustness and biological performance. While naked seeds (70.3% emergence) and buried fireclay balls (67.2% emergence) exhibited the highest overall emergence and post-emergence shoot length, surface-deployed seed balls formulated with higher proportions of bentonite and loam (e.g., 2:4:1 ratio) demonstrated the superior structural integrity necessary for resisting degradation during deployment. However, these denser matrices significantly reduced emergence probabilities and restricted shoot development compared to naked seeds. Formulations lacking loam (1:3) performed the poorest across all biological and structural metrics. Despite reduced emergence relative to buried treatments, surface-deployed seed balls still achieved high viability, outperforming typical field germination rates. Although further field-based refinement is required to test formulations under dynamic hydrodynamic and bioturbation pressures, seed balls offer a scientifically robust, scalable mechanism to bypass early-stage predation and support widespread seascape recovery.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 6%
26.6%
2
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
3
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
5
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
6
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
8
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
Limnology and Oceanography
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
15
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
ICES Journal of Marine Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
18
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
20
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
Bioresource Technology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
24
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Developmental Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Journal of Phycology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
29
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
30
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%