Back

Riboflavin-sensitized UVA collagen crosslinking produced a controllable, dose-dependent increase in the nanomechanical strength of ex vivo bovine dura mater

Vasilikos, I.; Swamy, S. M.; Hofmann, U. G.; Hubbe, U.; Rölz, R.; Stathi, A.; Wolk, K.; Strahnen, D.; El Rahal, A.; Shah, M. J.; Grauvogel, J.; Volz, F.; Mizaikoff, B.; Diaz, L.; Ravi, V. M. R. M.; Joseph, K.; Beck, J.

2026-06-08 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.03.729951 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDural defects, either from trauma, tumor resection, surgical approaches, genetics, or spontaneously represent a significant clinical challenge in neurosurgery. Given the established efficacy of riboflavin-sensitized ultraviolet-A (UVA) photo-crosslinking in ophthalmology, this study investigated its feasibility and dose-response characteristics as a novel strategy to biochemically augment the mechanical integrity and strength of ex-vivo bovine dura mater. MethodsForty bovine dura mater specimens were treated ex vivo using riboflavin concentrations of 2, 4, or 8 mM combined with UVA irradiation at 0.3 or 3 mW/cm{superscript 2}. PBS-treated specimens exposed to UVA served as controls. Atomic force microscopy nanoindentation was used to measure the local elastic modulus in matched regions before and after treatment, enabling paired assessment of treatment-induced mechanical changes while minimizing inter-sample variability. Post-treatment stiffness, fold-change from baseline, and riboflavin dose-response relationships were analyzed statistically. ResultsBaseline elastic moduli were equivalent across all groups (mean approximately 52 kPa, p=0.92). While UVA alone caused a modest approximately 2- to 3-fold stiffness increase, riboflavin-UVA treatment produced a dramatic, concentration-dependent effect. The highest treatment (8 mM RF, 3 mW/cm{superscript 2} UVA) increased the elastic modulus 150-fold, from approximately 53 kPa to approximately 8,000 kPa. Post-UV stiffness exhibited a strong linear relationship with riboflavin concentration (R{superscript 2} = 0.994), indicating a precisely titratable crosslinking effect. All treatment conditions were statistically distinguishable (p < 0.001). ConclusionRiboflavin-sensitized UVA crosslinking substantially increases the nanomechanical strength of ex vivo bovine dura mater in a controllable, dose-dependent manner. These findings establish a proof of concept for biochemical reinforcement of dural tissue that might be used clinically. As a next step evaluation using human dura, macroscopic biomechanical testing, penetration-depth analysis, and safety assessment is warranted.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 7%
8.0%
3
Translational Vision Science & Technology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
4
Photochemistry and Photobiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
8
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
10
Experimental Eye Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
11
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.7%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
ACS Applied Bio Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
18
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
21
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
24
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
26
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
28
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
29
Journal of Microbiological Methods
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%