Back

Aerial imagery and deep learning accurately estimate maize foliar disease severity

Hammett, C. H.; Rumley, K.; Balint-Kurti, P.; Gage, J. L.

2026-06-06 plant biology
10.64898/2026.06.03.729887 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Southern leaf blight (SLB) is a foliar disease of maize (Zea mays L.) caused by the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Cochliobolus heterostrophus. Genetic resistance is the most effective control method for SLB. Developing disease resistant maize lines requires field trials during which disease phenotypes must be visually assessed. Remote sensing using drones is an emerging technology that can be leveraged for high-throughput phenotyping of disease severity that is otherwise labor-intensive and subjective. This project used a deep learning approach to estimate SLB disease severity of single-row maize plots from drone imagery. Over 26,000 plot-level images produced from flights conducted across three growing seasons were labeled with in-field visual scores taken contemporaneously by expert raters. Variation in environmental conditions contributed to a labeled image dataset that reflects the complexity of agronomic field experiments. We assessed the ability of nine deep learning models from three architectural families to estimate disease severity. The best-performing model, EVA-02-B, achieved strong cross year generalization (R2 = 0.697). Error analysis found that performance was more strongly associated with seasonal disease progression and flight-score time offset than with image-level noise. UAV-based deep learning estimated SLB severity with comparable precision to expert raters. This study lays the groundwork for integrating automated phenotypes into genetic studies of disease resistance. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYSouthern leaf blight (SLB) of maize is a disease that causes yield loss worldwide and developing resistant varieties offers the best hope for controlling the disease. Studying SLB resistance requires plant pathologists to visually score severity in the field, a labor-intensive method that requires expertise. To address these challenges, we asked whether SLB severity scoring could be automated using drone images and artificial intelligence (AI). We trained AI models using three years of image and score data then compared the results to visual scores taken by five plant pathologists. The best performing AI model showed a similar level of consistency to the experts and proved capable of scoring severity despite unpredictable and uncontrollable conditions that affect field imaging experiments such as weeds or shadows. These findings provide a validated method that improves the efficiency of maize disease research, a critical area of study for agricultural sustainability and productivity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Phenomics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Phytopathology®
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.7%
4
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
7
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
9
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.2%
10
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.0%
12
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
Remote Sensing
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Applications in Plant Sciences
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
Plant Disease
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Plant Pathology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
in silico Plants
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
24
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%