Back

Snip Happens: A Retrospective Study of Vasectomy and Birth rates in Australia

Janetzki, J.; Modi, N.; Varney, B.; Pratt, N.; Ward, M.; Wiese, M.; Lim, R.; Kalisch Ellett, L.

2026-06-05 sexual and reproductive health
10.64898/2026.06.03.26354864 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Fertility rates in Australia have been declining over recent decades, reaching a record low total fertility rate of 1.48 births per woman in 2024. Concurrently, vasectomy remains widely accessible and increasingly normalised as a permanent contraceptive option. Despite extensive commentary on falling birth rates, no contemporary Australian study has examined vasectomy rates relative to birth rates over time. We aimed to compare population level vasectomy and birth rates across Australian jurisdictions and age groups. Study design Nationwide retrospective time-series study. Retrospective population-based study using Medicare Benefits Schedule item 37623 to identify vasectomy procedures performed between July 2015 and December 2024. Rates were calculated per 100,000 male population using quarterly Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) population estimates and summarised as rolling 12-month averages. Birth rates were derived using matched ABS data for women across equivalent age strata (18-24, 25-34, 35-44 years). Results: Vasectomy rates increased nationally from 32 per 100,000 in 2016 to 55 per 100,000 in 2023 before declining modestly in 2024. Birth rates declined from 5,200 to 3,800 per 100,000 over the same period. Trends were consistent across states and age groups, with the greatest vasectomy uptake in men aged 35-44 years. Conclusion: Australia is undergoing a demographic shift characterised by rising vasectomy uptake and declining fertility. While vasectomy rates remain lower than birth rates, their convergence signals changing reproductive intentions and contraceptive behaviours. Ongoing monitoring of permanent and long-acting contraception is essential to understand evolving population dynamics and inform reproductive health policy.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.6%
2
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.2%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.5%
5
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
6
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
9
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
11
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
12
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
13
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
14
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
15
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
16
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
19
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.5%
30
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%