Back

Oxygen-based endotypes of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Wellman, A.; Messineo, L.; Azarbarzin, A.; Esmaeili, N.; Aishah, A.; Vena, D.; Sumner, J.; White, D.; Sands, S.

2026-06-04 respiratory medicine
10.64898/2026.06.03.26354835 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: Several endotypes contribute to the development of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). However, efforts to measure these endotypes have been challenging. In this paper, we propose a new method that overcomes some of these challenges. Methods: To test the feasibility of this new method, data from the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) were analyzed and two oxygen-based endotypes were identified and plotted on a graphical model: the steady-state SpO2 and the SpO2 arousal threshold. The first is the oxygen saturation that would occur during sleep if there were no arousals, and it is a measure of upper airway collapsibility (a more collapsible airway produces a lower SpO2). The latter is the oxygen saturation that triggers arousals. These endotypes were validated by assessing their ability to detect positional and state-related changes in airway collapsibility and arousal threshold. Results: The study showed that it was feasible to measure oxygen-based endotypes in 95% of SHHS participants. As expected, steady-state SpO2 was lower during supine vs. non-supine sleep, as well as during REM vs. NREM sleep. Also, the SpO2 arousal threshold was similar between supine and non-supine sleep. However, SpO2 arousal threshold was not lower in REM sleep vs. NREM sleep. Therefore, in 3 of the 4 conditions, the oxygen-based endotypes moved in the expected direction due to positional or sleep state changes. Conclusion: Although further validation experiments are required, this study indicates that OSA endotyping using the pulse oximetry signal is feasible. The oxygen-based endotypes could be used to aid therapeutic decision making.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
18.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.4%
3
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
4
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
9
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
12
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
SLEEP
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%