Back

Bayesian networks to estimate prognosis in vascular cognitive impairment and small vessel disease: integrated analyses of interdependent contributors to multiple outcomes

Overmars, L. M.; Allaart, C.; Bron, E. E.; Brunner La Rocca, H.-P.; de Bresser, J.; Muller, M.; van Osch, M. J. P.; Teunissen, C.; Tijms, B. M.; Wolters, F. J.; Biessels, G. J.; Heart-Brain Connection Consortium,

2026-06-04 neurology
10.64898/2026.06.03.26354793 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) and small vessel disease (SVD) involve many interconnected factors influencing multiple outcomes, also beyond cognitive decline. Bayesian networks (BNs) can help unravel these complex interrelations, which we demonstrate in this proof-of-concept study in the Heart-Brain Connection cohort, including memory-clinic patients with SVD, patients with heart failure, carotid occlusive disease, and reference participants. Methods: We trained BNs and jointly modelled cognitive decline (Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) increase) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) over five years as outcomes in relation to multiple demographic and disease factors and emerging imaging and plasma biomarkers, also considering possible non-random dropout. Results: Of 566 individuals (median age 68, 64% men), 134 had MACE and 112 experienced CDR increase. Diagnostic group and baseline cognition were key determinants of both outcomes. The BN identified baseline clinical severity as a non-random dropout source. Plasma biomarkers formed an interconnected subnetwork, linked to demographic and vascular factors, but without direct dependencies with outcomes. The trained BN also provides individualized inference under partial evidence, informing on outcome probabilities. Conclusion: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates how BNs quantify and visualize the dependency structure underlying prognostic heterogeneity in VCI and SVD, including non-random dropout and positioning of emerging biomarkers.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
22.5%
2
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.3%
3
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.1%
4
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
5
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
7
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
11
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%