Back

Registered Report: Artifact Index for Capacitive Electrocardiography Acquired with an Armchair

Warnecke, J. M.; Baumgärtel, D.; Bollmann, J.; Deserno, T. M.

2026-06-09 health informatics
10.64898/2026.06.03.26353526 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Continuous health monitoring enables early detection of diseases and improves therapeutic outcomes. Non-intrusive biosignal sensors, such as capacitive ECG (cECG), offer a practical solution for daily monitoring in private environments, such as smart homes and vehicles. However, artifacts reduce signal quality and compromise reliability. Methods Following a registered report protocol (Warnecke JM et al. Plos One. 2021; 16(7):e0254780), we record data of 44 subjects and develop an artifact index for cECG. We use three signal quality indices (SQIs): the correlation of QRS complexes (corSQI), the R-peak detection consistency (bSQI) and the absolute amplitude ratio (aSQI). Our index classifies overlapping 10s segments with a step-width of 2s into clean or artifact segments. We label a 2s interval as artifacts if all five overlapping segments indicate artifacts. We record cECGs using an armchair with integrated electrodes in a single-arm study involving 44 subjects performing two activities -- reading and watching television (TV); for 11 minutes each. We record a time-synchronized reference ECG with skin electrodes on the chest. To evaluate the artifact index, we compare it with manually generated ground truth. Moreover, we evaluate the clothing materials cotton, linen, jeans, and polyester in 5 subjects. Results Watching TV results in longer, continuously clean signal durations than reading. On average, 88.3% of the signal has a minimum continuous clean duration of 10s, versus 79.8% during reading. All clothing configurations achieve a clean signal duration exceeding 10s. Among the SQI metrics, bSQI performs best, achieving an accuracy of 90.7% and an F1 score of 79.9%. Combining the three SQI metrics in a voting approach improves accuracy to 92.0% and F1 score to 82.1%. Discussion Our artifact index automatically distinguishes clean from artifact cECG segments, promoting health monitoring in unsupervised real-world settings, earlier disease detection, and preventive health management. A limitation is the investigation of only two scenarios (reading and watching TV).

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.0%
2
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
4
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
7
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
8
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
10
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
13
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
16
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
27
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%