Back

LC-MS Metabolomics Reveals No Significant Impact of Microbial Inoculation with Bacillus velezensis and Lachnum sp. on Cranberry Metabolome

Ali, E. T.; Findlay, B.

2026-06-06 plant biology
10.64898/2026.06.02.729675 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sustainable agriculture has driven increased exploration of microbial inoculants as a promising strategy to boost plant growth for higher yield and enhance secondary metabolism to increase crop nutritional value. However, their influence on fruit-specific metabolites under field conditions remains understudied. This study investigated the impact of inoculating cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) plants with Bacillus velezensis EB37 and Lachnum sp. EC5, applied individually and in combination, on cranberry fruit phytochemistry. Over two growing seasons (2019 and 2021), cranberries were collected from treated and control plots and analysed using untargeted and targeted LC-MS-based metabolomics. Multivariate analysis revealed no significant metabolomic differences due to treatments. However, samples clustered strongly by year of harvest, highlighting a pronounced environmental effect. Quantitative analysis of six representative phenolic compounds: chlorogenic acid, catechin, p-coumaric acid, phloridzin, myricetin, and quercetin, showed no statistically significant differences between treated and control cranberries. These findings indicate that microbial inoculation alone does not alter cranberry fruit metabolome, including phenolic levels, at field conditions. This study underscores how multiple factors, such as environmental conditions, can affect the outcome of microbial inoculation under field conditions and suggests that additional interventions may be required to achieve microbiome-based improvements in cranberry fruit quality.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.3%
5
Food Chemistry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
9
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
10
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Plant Stress
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Physiologia Plantarum
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
18
Plant Biotechnology Journal
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
19
Environmental Microbiome
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
Food & Function
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
Metabolomics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
Biotechnology for Biofuels
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
25
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
29
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
30
Metabolites
53 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%