Back

ArchaeaHQ: A Curated Reference Database of Archaeal Genomes

Bespiatykh, D.; Leao, P.

2026-06-03 microbiology
10.64898/2026.06.02.729493 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Archaea have proven to be major players in biogeochemical cycles across diverse ecosystems, yet we still see an underrepresentation of archaeal genomes in the datasets used by popular computational biology tools. Here we present ArchaeaHQ, a quality-controlled, systematically curated reference database of 21,644 archaeal genomes compiled initially from 35,993 assemblies from all four archaeal kingdoms retrieved from NCBI: Methanobacteriati (Euryarchaeota), Thermoproteati (TACK), Nanobdellati (DPANN), and Promethearchaeati (Asgard). All genomes in the database passed standardized quality control, requiring [≥]70% completeness and [≤]10% contamination. A total of 44.2% of genomes in ArchaeaHQ achieved [≥]90% completeness, while 93.1% exhibited [≤]5% contamination. ArchaeaHQ comprises 16,199 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs; 74.8%) and 5,445 isolate genomes (25.2%). Approximately 75% of MAGs are assigned to 17 ecologically meaningful categories based on sampling origin, and around 65% of genomes include geographic metadata. ArchaeaHQ is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32266599 and provides an analysis-ready reference set for metagenomic classification, biogeochemical and ecological studies, comparative genomics, and development of archaeal-specific bioinformatic tools. Impact StatementArchaea are key drivers of the global carbon, nitrogen and methane cycles, yet their genomes remain underrepresented and inconsistently curated in the public databases that power modern computational biology tools. We present ArchaeaHQ, a quality-controlled, systematically curated reference set of 21,644 archaeal genomes spanning all four archaeal kingdoms, each passing standardized completeness and contamination thresholds and enriched with environmental and geographic metadata. By providing an analysis-ready, downloadable resource compatible with standard pipelines, ArchaeaHQ fits the gap between taxonomy-focused frameworks and unfiltered genome archives supporting metagenomic classification, biogeochemical and ecological studies, comparative genomics, and the development of archaeal-specific bioinformatic tools.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.4%
2
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.7%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.1%
4
Microbiology Resource Announcements
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
5
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.4%
6
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.3%
7
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.3%
10
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.3%
11
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.7%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 23%
2.3%
14
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
15
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
16
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
17
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
19
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
21
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
22
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
23
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
24
MicrobiologyOpen
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
25
Environmental Microbiome
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
28
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
29
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
30
Journal of Bacteriology
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%