Back

Mycol: A user-friendly app for automating analysis of microscopy images

Bradley, S. A.; Schiesaro, G.; Webel, H.; Skumantz, M.; Novillo-Sanjuan, O.; Panagou, A.; Lucena-Marin, R.; Jensen, E. D.; Di Pietro, A.; Acevedo-Rocha, C. G.

2026-06-05 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.02.729113 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Microscopy image analysis is central to modern biology, yet many available platforms remain inaccessible to non-specialist users because they require advanced technical expertise, code-based workflows, extensive setup, or paid access. This creates a barrier for researchers who need reliable and fast image quantification but lack dedicated computational support. Here, we introduce Mycol, an open-source, machine-learning-assisted image analysis platform designed to be accessible and run on standard laptops with minimal setup. Mycol supports end-to-end workflows in which users annotate microscopy images, perform human-in-the-loop fine-tuning of machine learning models for automated segmentation and classification, deploy machine learning models, quality control predictions and quantitatively compare morphological and class frequency descriptors through a single intuitive interface. By combining machine-learning analysis with efficient quality control by humans, Mycol makes rapid and high-quality image quantification available to biologists without requiring specialist training. We demonstrate the utility of Mycol in diverse workflows using two economically important organisms, the crop pathogen (Fusarium oxysporum) and the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis). Through Mycol, curated training sets were generated and high quality segmentation and classification models were obtained in each case. Deploying these models through Mycol decreased the time requirements and increased traceability of established cell counting workflows and facilitated a quantitative comparison of morphological parameters that reveals new patterns in early M. edulis larval development.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.8%
3
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
9.7%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.3%
5
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.3%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
BMC Methods
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
11
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
13
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Journal of Microscopy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
20
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
21
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
22
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.1%
24
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
25
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
26
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
28
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Cytometry Part A
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%