Back

Comparison of the Mini Parasep SF, ParaPak SpinCon, and Paradevice fecal filtration and concentration devices for microscopic and AI-assisted detection of intestinal parasites

Morris, H.; Pritt, B. S.

2026-06-04 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354769 medRxiv
Show abstract

Effective filtration and concentration of stool specimens is an essential pre-analytical step for reducing fecal debris and improving organism recovery using microscopy-based ova and parasite (O&P) examination. This study evaluated three commercially available fecal sedimentation-based filtration/concentration systems, ParaPak SpinCon (Meridian Bioscience), Mini Parasep SF (Apacor), and the newly-available ParadeviceReingenuity), for qualitative parasite detection and workflow logistics using conventional and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted microscopy. Forty clinical stool specimens (20 parasite-positive and 20 parasite-negative) were processed with the 3 devices, and the resultant 120 wet mount and 120 trichrome stained smear preparations were examined using conventional microscopy. Trichrome-stained slides were also scanned at 40x magnification using a Hamamatsu NanoZoomerS360 flatbed digital slide scanner and images were analyzed using the Techcyte Fusion Human Fecal Trichrome AI algorithm. Positive and indeterminate digital findings were confirmed by conventional glass slide microscopy. Slides and digital images were reviewed in a blinded manner. Concordance was assessed among the 360 initial evaluations (microscopy and AI-assisted), and discrepant parasitology results were resolved through re-review and specimen reprocessing as needed. Final qualitative agreement across slide/image evaluations using all three concentration systems was 100%. Minor discrepancies in protozoan and white/red blood cell detection/identification were noted in 5 and 7 cases, respectively, and likely reflected sampling and observer variability. While the three concentration systems produced equivalent qualitative results, the Paradevice and Mini Parasep SF offered the most streamlined workflows. These findings support the Paradevice and Mini Parasep SF as efficient, analytically equivalent systems that are compatible with traditional and AI-assisted O&P workflows.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.2%
2
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.2%
3
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.0%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.5%
6
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
9
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
11
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
12
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
17
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
22
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%