Back

Adult-Learning Newborn Medicine Curriculum Improves Knowledge in a Low-Resource Neonatal Unit in Sierra Leone

Mvula, M.; Amin, A.; Patil, M. S.; Valentine, G.; Mukarwego, B.; Wagner, S.; Dumbuya, I.; Lou, L.; Sanni, U.; Hansen, A.

2026-06-04 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354766 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Sierra Leones neonatal mortality rate is among the highest in the world. Koidu Government Hospital opened a Special Care Baby Unit (SCBU) in 2020. To increase knowledge of the SCBU health care providers (HCPs), a neonatal curriculum was implemented to facilitate HCP education on management of neonatal conditions. The aim of this study was to understand the effect of the curriculum on knowledge acquisition and the perception of the teaching methodologies among participating HCPs. Methods US-based mentors facilitated a two-phase, flipped classroom, virtual neonatal medicine curriculum between October 2024 and April 2025, followed by one-week in-person education sessions with SCBU HCPs. With each phase, participants completed pre- and post-test educational assessments. At the end of the curriculum, they completed a subjective assessment to capture perceptions related to the quality of teaching methodologies integrated within the curriculum. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to assess pre- versus post-test change. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the subjective assessment. Results Thirty-eight participants completed the educational assessments, 30 (79%) took all four pre- and post-tests; 25/38 (65.8%) were female, 27 (71.1%) were nurses. Median correct answers for both phases increased from the pre- to post-test for individual learners [Phase 1, pre-test 14/27 (51.9%), post-test 23/27 (85.2%), p<0.001], [Phase 2, pre-test 14/25 (56.0%), post-test 23/25 (92.0%), p <0.001]. Thirty-one participants completed the subjective assessment, of whom 96.8% (30/31) rated the curriculum to be "very effective." All 31 participants indicated that the in-person instruction was "very helpful." Through open text responses, they offered valuable insight into challenges, strengths, and next steps. Conclusion This neonatal curriculum resulted in significantly increased knowledge and was well regarded. Adapting this curriculum or similar curricula show promise to improve the quality of care for small and/or sick neonates in low resource settings.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
17.7%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
14.8%
3
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.9%
5
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
7
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
9
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
12
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
13
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
20
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.6%
24
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
25
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
27
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%