Back

The Surgical Assessment and Healthcare (SAH) Index: A Risk-Adjusted Framework for Surgeon-Level Quality Audit in Gastric Cancer

Sah, B. K.; Li, J.; Zhang, M.; Jin, R.; Li, X.; Dong, C.; Chen, E.

2026-06-03 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354716 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Gastric cancer management is heterogeneous, and although the treating surgeon leads decisions across the pathway, surgeon level outcome variation remains poorly quantified. This study assessed surgeon identity as an independent predictor of survival after risk adjustment, introducing the Surgical Assessment and Healthcare (SAH) Index. Methods This single institution retrospective study (Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; NCT07180966) included 692 patients undergoing curative-intent resection for gastric adenocarcinoma (pStage I ,II, III) in 2019 by eight consultant surgeons. Overall survival was modelled by multivariable Cox regression (primary model, 199 events, EPV 16.6; complete-case sensitivity model, N = 647). The SAH Index expressed surgeon * stage observed-to-expected ratios for five-year mortality and major morbidity (Clavien Dindo [≥] IIIa). Median follow up was 74.3 months. Results Independent predictors of survival were tumour stage (HR 2.979/step), age (HR 1.030/year), and non-distal gastrectomy (HR 1.498; all p [≤] .006). After full adjustment, surgeon identity remained significant (Wald = 14.58, df = 7, p = .042): two surgeons carried roughly double the reference hazard S6 (HR 2.219, p = .003) and S8 (HR 2.034, p = .031) both with the cohort's lowest neoadjuvant chemotherapy rates (3.0% and 7.0% versus 17.6%), implicating pre-operative pathway decisions. The effect persisted in the sensitivity model (MSI also prognostic, HR 3.162, p = .007). Morbidity benchmarking flagged no surgeon for excess complications (no Tier 2 flags) and one survival-outlier cell (S6, Stage II; Tier 3). Conclusion Surgeon identity is independently associated with survival in gastric cancer beyond measurable case mix. The SAH Index offers a reproducible tool for institutional and inter-hospital benchmarking, with tier assignments stable across all four prespecified weighting scenarios confirming tier classification is independent of weight specification.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.2%
2
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.8%
3
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
7
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
8
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
10
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
11
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
12
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
13
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
14
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
16
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
17
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
18
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
19
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
20
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
21
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
24
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
29
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%