Back

The Surgical Assessment and Healthcare (SAH) Index: A Risk-Adjusted Framework for Surgeon-Level Quality Audit in Gastric Cancer

Sah, B. K.; Li, J.; Zhang, M.; Jin, R.; Li, X.; Dong, C.; Chen, E.

2026-06-03 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354716 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Gastric cancer management is heterogeneous, and although the treating surgeon leads decisions across the pathway, surgeon level outcome variation remains poorly quantified. This study assessed surgeon identity as an independent predictor of survival after risk adjustment, introducing the Surgical Assessment and Healthcare (SAH) Index. Methods This single institution retrospective study (Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; NCT07180966) included 692 patients undergoing curative-intent resection for gastric adenocarcinoma (pStage I ,II, III) in 2019 by eight consultant surgeons. Overall survival was modelled by multivariable Cox regression (primary model, 199 events, EPV 16.6; complete-case sensitivity model, N = 647). The SAH Index expressed surgeon * stage observed-to-expected ratios for five-year mortality and major morbidity (Clavien Dindo [≥] IIIa). Median follow up was 74.3 months. Results Independent predictors of survival were tumour stage (HR 2.979/step), age (HR 1.030/year), and non-distal gastrectomy (HR 1.498; all p [≤] .006). After full adjustment, surgeon identity remained significant (Wald = 14.58, df = 7, p = .042): two surgeons carried roughly double the reference hazard S6 (HR 2.219, p = .003) and S8 (HR 2.034, p = .031) both with the cohort's lowest neoadjuvant chemotherapy rates (3.0% and 7.0% versus 17.6%), implicating pre-operative pathway decisions. The effect persisted in the sensitivity model (MSI also prognostic, HR 3.162, p = .007). Morbidity benchmarking flagged no surgeon for excess complications (no Tier 2 flags) and one survival-outlier cell (S6, Stage II; Tier 3). Conclusion Surgeon identity is independently associated with survival in gastric cancer beyond measurable case mix. The SAH Index offers a reproducible tool for institutional and inter-hospital benchmarking, with tier assignments stable across all four prespecified weighting scenarios confirming tier classification is independent of weight specification.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.