Back

Whole-exome-based preconception carrier screening in Uzbekistan with targeted SMA, FMR1, and DMD assays: the first reported clinical program

Kullyev, A.; Avdeichik, S.; Akimenkova, A.; Kartuesov, A.; Kardymon, O.; Goikhman, Y.

2026-06-04 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354713 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Purpose: Published clinical outcome data on preconception carrier screening (PCS) in Central Asia are limited. We report the first clinical implementation study from Uzbekistan of a whole-exome sequencing (WES)-based multi-platform PCS program combining exome sequencing with targeted SMA, FMR1, and DMD assays. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed anonymized data from 65 individuals (19 couples, 27 singletons) screened at IMC Genomics, Tashkent, between January 2024 and May 2026. WES covering the protein-coding regions of approximately 20,000 genes was followed by exome-wide bioinformatics filtering and clinical geneticist interpretation. Partly overlapping cohorts underwent SMA carrier screening (n=179), FMR1 CGG-repeat analysis in females (n=155), and DMD deletion/duplication testing in preconception females (n=29). Variants were classified by ACMG/AMP criteria against gnomAD v4.1. Results: Sixty-one of 65 WES-screened individuals (93.8%; 95% CI 85.2 - 97.6%) carried at least one reportable variant (152 instances across 126 genes). Four of 19 couples (21.1%; 95% CI 8.5 - 43.3%) were concordant for pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the same autosomal recessive gene; two were referred for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease. SMA screening identified four carriers, including two 2+0 silent carriers; FMR1 analysis identified one intermediate allele; DMD MLPA identified no exonic rearrangements. Conclusion: This first reported WES-based multi-platform PCS program in Uzbekistan was feasible and clinically informative, identifying actionable couple-level reproductive risks and supporting structured implementation of reproductive genetic screening in Central Asia.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.6%
3
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
4
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
5
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.9%
7
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
11
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
12
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
15
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.1%
17
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Genetics in Medicine Open
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
21
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
25
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%