Back

Prototyping a Generative AI-powered Person-centered Digital Health Tool to Mitigate Risk of Preventable Adverse Drug Events

Dobbins, D.; Russell, A.; Gunther, M.; Shetty, V.; Shomali, A.; Vawdrey, D.; Waring, S.; Whary, P.; Wong, J.; Wright, E. A.; Olson, A. W.

2026-06-04 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354712 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives: Older adults with comorbidities and polypharmacy have disproportionately high risk of hospitalization as well as readmission from adverse drug events (ADEs), of which 28%-71% are preventable (pADEs). This paper introduces an LLM application, CommunicADE, designed to support risk-mitigation of pADE-related readmission for the aforementioned population. We aim to evaluate CommunicADE's technical performance with OpenAI's HealthBench criteria: accuracy, completeness, communication quality, context awareness, and instruction following. Materials and Methods: Our technical validation study used an LLM (KimiK2.5) to simulate interviews between CommunicADE and nine high-fidelity synthetic patients hospitalized and at increased risk for pADE-related readmission (65+ years, comorbidities, 5+ medications). Some pADE risk mechanisms clues were visible to CommunicADE in patient H&Ps, but most mechanisms were solely discoverable in interviews. Two pharmacists evaluated CommunicADE's interview questions and EHR notes with HealthBench-informed variables. Analyzes used descriptive statistics. Results: For 35 mechanisms across 9 patients (avg=3.89 mechanisms/patient), CommunicADE's precision and recall were 0.92 and 0.63, respectively. Hallucinations were absent. Coherence and person-centeredness scored 4.28 and 4.44 on a 5-point scale (5=highest). On average, communication was at a 5th grade level and objective for 78% of patients. Most patient-reported quotes included in notes (92%) supported detected mechanisms. CommunicADE followed all instructions regarding interview length and patient approvals. Discussion: CommunicADE's strongest performance was in accuracy (precision, hallucinations), communication quality (coherence, readability), context awareness (person-centeredness). Completeness (recall) and instruction following (objectivity, pADE mechanism/quote alignment) show room for improvement. Conclusion: Findings suggest technical readiness for a feasibility pilot with real-world patients, and key areas for performance improvement.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.7%
2
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.1%
4
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
5
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
6
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
8
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
9
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
10
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
11
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
12
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
15
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
16
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
18
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
19
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
21
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%