Back

Comfort with AI for HIV Prevention Among Cisgender Women in New York City

Reyes Nieva, H.; Flanagan, M.; Huang, S.; Theodore, D. A.; Nkodo, A. F.; Parkinson, M.; Hill, S.; McAndrew, M.; Benitez, J. A.; Peralta, H.; Amesty, S.; Zucker, J. E.; Sobieszczyk, M.; Castor, D.

2026-06-03 health informatics
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354471 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) expands HIV prevention options for women. However, PrEP impact depends on addressing persistent gaps in awareness, access, and use. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including conversational agents, are being explored to advance PrEP uptake, but comfort with AI may influence their impact. Thus, we examined women's comfort with AI and its association with PrEP awareness. Methods: We analyzed self-reported data from women aged [≥]18 years in a cross-sectional survey conducted in New York City from August 2023 to August 2024. We performed descriptive analyses, applied latent class analysis to identify AI knowledge/comfort profiles, and estimated unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios to assess associations between profile membership and PrEP awareness. Results: Among 306 respondents without a diagnosis of HIV who completed AI-related survey items, the median age was 36. Most women identified as Hispanic/Latina (60%) or Non-Hispanic Black (18%), had not completed college (53%), and spoke only English or were bilingual (81%). Latent class analysis identified four AI knowledge/comfort profiles that differed by PrEP awareness, race/ethnicity, borough, prior drug use, and technology utilization. Women with varied AI knowledge, broad AI discomfort, and comfort with clinicians maintaining privacy had lower odds of PrEP awareness (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16-0.75), but this association did not persist after statistical adjustment. Conclusions: PrEP awareness and AI knowledge were limited, yet many women expressed openness to AI-enabled tools when privacy was assured. AI-enabled HIV prevention tools should prioritize trust, transparency, confidentiality, and the lived contexts of the women they intend to serve.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.1%
2
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
3
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
4
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
9
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
10
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
12
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
14
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
16
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
18
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
AIDS and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%