Back

Prognostic performance of an AI-based recurrence risk model in clinically low-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer

Tang, C.; Biswas, D.; Liu, C.; Zeng, K.; Geras, K. J.; Witowski, J.; Meurs, C.; Westenend, P. J.

2026-06-03 oncology
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354233 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective Accurate prognostication of recurrence risk in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer is central for therapeutic decision-making, including identifying patients who may safely avoid adjuvant systemic therapy. However, the performance of existing prognostic tools remains insufficient for effective clinical stratification, motivating the development of artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods to improve risk stratification. Methods Ataraxis Breast CTX (ATX) is a multi-modal AI test that integrates H&E-stained whole-slide images with clinicopathologic features to predict risk of recurrence for individual patients. This study aims to validate ATX in an external dataset enriched for clinically low-risk patients from Dordrecht, the Netherlands. ATX scores were generated for 892 women diagnosed with early HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Of the 892 patients, 299 did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy. The discriminative performance of ATX was assessed using C-index and its stratification ability was evaluated by log-rank tests comparing Kaplan-Meier survival curves across risk groups. Results ATX achieved a C-index of 0.71 and a 5-year time-dependent AUC of 0.71, demonstrating strong discrimination in predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS). Among 299 patients who received no adjuvant therapy, ATX achieved a C-index and time-dependent AUC of 0.78 and 0.81 respectively, suggesting ATX retains prognostic information in the absence of systemic therapy. ATX scores were used to stratify patients into risk groups using a pre-specified threshold, where 656 (74%) were classified as ATX low-risk and 236 (26%) were classified as high-risk. Notably, untreated and treated ATX low-risk patients had comparable 5-year RFS (untreated: 5-year RFS = 96%, 95% CI = 92-97%; treated: 5-year RFS = 96%, 95% CI = 93-97%) with near identical 10-year RFS (86%, 95% CI = 83-92% for both), suggesting ATX low-risk status may identify a subgroup with favorable prognosis independent of treatment exposure. Conclusion ATX provides robust prognostic stratification in an external cohort of clinically low-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer and identifies a subgroup of patients who did not receive systemic therapy with favorable observed outcomes. These results support prospective validation of ATX as a decision-support tool for adjuvant therapy de-escalation in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
4
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
6
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.2%
9
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
10
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
12
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
14
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
15
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
17
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
20
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
22
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
27
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
28
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
29
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%