Back

Prognostic performance of an AI-based recurrence risk model in clinically low-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer

Tang, C.; Biswas, D.; Liu, C.; Zeng, K.; Geras, K. J.; Witowski, J.; Meurs, C.; Westenend, P. J.

2026-06-03 oncology
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354233 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective Accurate prognostication of recurrence risk in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer is central for therapeutic decision-making, including identifying patients who may safely avoid adjuvant systemic therapy. However, the performance of existing prognostic tools remains insufficient for effective clinical stratification, motivating the development of artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods to improve risk stratification. Methods Ataraxis Breast CTX (ATX) is a multi-modal AI test that integrates H&E-stained whole-slide images with clinicopathologic features to predict risk of recurrence for individual patients. This study aims to validate ATX in an external dataset enriched for clinically low-risk patients from Dordrecht, the Netherlands. ATX scores were generated for 892 women diagnosed with early HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Of the 892 patients, 299 did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy. The discriminative performance of ATX was assessed using C-index and its stratification ability was evaluated by log-rank tests comparing Kaplan-Meier survival curves across risk groups. Results ATX achieved a C-index of 0.71 and a 5-year time-dependent AUC of 0.71, demonstrating strong discrimination in predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS). Among 299 patients who received no adjuvant therapy, ATX achieved a C-index and time-dependent AUC of 0.78 and 0.81 respectively, suggesting ATX retains prognostic information in the absence of systemic therapy. ATX scores were used to stratify patients into risk groups using a pre-specified threshold, where 656 (74%) were classified as ATX low-risk and 236 (26%) were classified as high-risk. Notably, untreated and treated ATX low-risk patients had comparable 5-year RFS (untreated: 5-year RFS = 96%, 95% CI = 92-97%; treated: 5-year RFS = 96%, 95% CI = 93-97%) with near identical 10-year RFS (86%, 95% CI = 83-92% for both), suggesting ATX low-risk status may identify a subgroup with favorable prognosis independent of treatment exposure. Conclusion ATX provides robust prognostic stratification in an external cohort of clinically low-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer and identifies a subgroup of patients who did not receive systemic therapy with favorable observed outcomes. These results support prospective validation of ATX as a decision-support tool for adjuvant therapy de-escalation in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.5%
2
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.6%
4
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.1%
5
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
8
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.2%
10
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
12
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.3%
14
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
19
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
26
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.6%
28
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%