AI Chatbots as Emerging Tools in Youth Mental Health Help-Seeking: Insights from New Jersey Youth
Alvarado-Torres, R.; Kakauridze, I.; Bonnevie, E.
Show abstract
Youth in the United States are experiencing growing mental health challenges, yet many face barriers to accessing timely, affordable, and stigma-free support. At the same time, artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots have become widely available and are increasingly being used by young people as tools for information seeking, coping, and self-reflection. This brief report explores how youth are engaging with AI chatbots for mental health support, drawing from qualitative interviews conducted in New Jersey. Nine semi-structured interviews were completed with participants ages 19-22. Thematic analysis revealed five core themes: (1) generational change, peer communication, and humor as coping and normalization tools; (2) internal and external barriers to self-recognition and help-seeking; (3) AI chatbots as a safe and accessible first step; (4) AI chatbots as a tool for filling information gaps; and (5) limits of AI chatbots and the preference for human connection. These findings indicate that young people see AI chatbots as private, judgment-free starting points for exploring their emotions and seeking early support. However, they also recognize that these tools cannot replace human connection or professional care. For public health, this presents both challenges and opportunities in utilizing the accessibility of AI chatbots while ensuring ethical design, cultural responsiveness, and protections that safeguard youth privacy and equity.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed methods analysis of youth mental health intervention feasibility and acceptability in a North American city: perspectives from Seattle, Washington 96%
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 96%
- How a year of pandemic and related public health measures impacted youth and young adults and the foundations they build upon: Qualitative interviews in Ontario Canada 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Priorities for Future Research about Screen Use and Adolescent Mental Health: A Participatory Prioritization Study 96%
- Co-development of a best practice checklist for mental health data science: A Delphi study 94%
- Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and use analysis of ‘gestioemocional.cat’, a web app for promoting emotional self-care and access to professional mental health resources during the covid-19 pandemic 93%
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 93%
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The social media response to twice-weekly mass asymptomatic testing in England 94%
- Feasibility and acceptability of daily testing at school as an alternative to self-isolation following close contact with a confirmed case of COVID-19: A qualitative analysis 93%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and well-being of people living with a long-term physical health condition: a qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 92%
- Evaluating the implementation of weekly rifapentine-isoniazid (3HP) for tuberculosis prevention among people living with HIV in Uganda: A qualitative evaluation of the 3HP Options Trial 92%
- Improving patient-centred counselling skills among lay healthcare workers in South Africa using the Thusa-Thuso motivational interviewing training and support program 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.