Back

Differences in microbial community structure and soil nutrients between healthy and diseased soils of Zingiber officinale

Ma, S.; Fang, F.; Li, J.; Zhang, T.; Wang, T.

2026-06-04 microbiology
10.64898/2026.06.01.729252 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To investigate the differences in soil nutrients and microbial community structure in the rhizosphere between healthy and diseased Zingiber officinale plants, soil samples were collected from healthy root-zone soil (ZSH), healthy rhizosphere soil (RSH), diseased root-zone soil (ZSD), and diseased rhizosphere soil (RSD). Diseased soils had significantly higher pH values, whereas RSH showed the strongest acidity. Moreover, pH, AN, and AK contents in diseased soils were significantly higher than those in healthy soils, while SOM and AP were significantly lower. The -diversity of microbial communities in diseased soils was significantly reduced, and the community structure was distinctly differentiated from that of healthy soils. In diseased soils, the abundance of potential pathogenic taxa such as Ralstonia solanacearum increased significantly, while beneficial genera such as Bradyrhizobium decreased. Redundancy analysis and correlation analysis indicated that soil pH, AN, SOM, and AP were the major environmental factors driving changes in microbial community structure. The occurrence of soil-borne diseases in Zingiber officinale is closely associated with soil nutrient imbalance and disruption of microbial community structure. The study identified candidate microbial taxa (e.g., beneficial Sphingomonas, Streptomyces) and key soil properties (pH, available nitrogen) that differentiate healthy from diseased ginger soils. Together, these findings provide a theoretical basis for improving diseased soils through microecological regulation strategies, and also serve as a foundation for generating testable hypotheses in future hypothesis-driven research on ginger soil-borne disease suppression.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.4%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.7%
4
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Applied Soil Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
6
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.4%
7
Plant and Soil
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
9
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
10
Environmental Microbiome
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
FEMS Microbiology Letters
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Microbial Ecology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
14
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
16
Phytobiomes Journal
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
17
FEMS Microbes
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
20
Archives of Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
22
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
24
Microbiological Research
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
25
Journal of Applied Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
26
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%